Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: write support for minor aligned partitions

[Pratyush Yadav]

On 08/06/21 02:07PM, John Thomson wrote:
> Do not prevent writing to mtd partitions where a partition boundary sits
> on a minor erasesize boundary.
> This addresses a FIXME that has been present since the start of the
> linux git history:
> /* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
> /* FIXME: Let it be writable if it is on a boundary of
>  * _minor_ erase size though */
> 
> Allow a uniform erase region spi-nor device to be configured
> to use the non-uniform erase regions code path for an erase with:
> CONFIG_MTD_SPI_NOR_USE_VARIABLE_ERASE=y
> 
> On supporting hardware (SECT_4K: majority of current SPI-NOR device)
> provide the facility for an erase to use the least number
> of SPI-NOR operations, as well as access to 4K erase without
> requiring CONFIG_MTD_SPI_NOR_USE_4K_SECTORS
> 
> Introduce erasesize_minor to the mtd struct,
> the smallest erasesize supported by the device

Instead of having just a major and minor erase size, wouldn't it make 
more sense to have a list of all supported erases on a sector? That is, 
instead of hard coding two erase size instead of one, how about 
generalizing the erase machinery to allow any number of erase sizes on a 
sector and then choosing the most efficient one on run time?

For example, imagine a device can support 4K, 64K, and 256K erases on 
each sector. Then you should be able to use 2 x 4K erases if you want to 
erase 8K, 2 x 64K + 1 x 4K erases for 132K and so on.

I am not very familiar with MTD erase machinery so I would like someone 
else to chime in, but I think my suggestion above is the better way 
forward.

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.