Re: [RFC] virtio-mem: virtio_mem_init: Access bb_size just in BBM mode

From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Tue Jun 15 2021 - 03:43:48 EST


On 15.06.21 08:59, Hui Zhu wrote:
From: Hui Zhu <teawaterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

/* In BBM, we also want at least two big blocks. */
vm->offline_threshold = max_t(uint64_t, 2 * vm->bbm.bb_size,
vm->offline_threshold);
This line does not modify vm->offline_threshold depending on the data in
vm->sbm that shares this address is 0 in SBM mode.
I think it might be difficult to make sure when we change this in the
future.

This commit adds an if to make sure that this line just be executed in
BBM mode.

Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <teawaterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
index 10ec60d..8185916 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
@@ -2472,8 +2472,9 @@ static int virtio_mem_init(struct virtio_mem *vm)
vm->offline_threshold = max_t(uint64_t, 2 * memory_block_size_bytes(),
VIRTIO_MEM_DEFAULT_OFFLINE_THRESHOLD);
/* In BBM, we also want at least two big blocks. */
- vm->offline_threshold = max_t(uint64_t, 2 * vm->bbm.bb_size,
- vm->offline_threshold);
+ if (!vm->in_sbm)
+ vm->offline_threshold = max_t(uint64_t, 2 * vm->bbm.bb_size,
+ vm->offline_threshold);
dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev, "start address: 0x%llx", vm->addr);
dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev, "region size: 0x%llx", vm->region_size);


Good that you also spotted it, I already have a fix pending for that :)

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210602185720.31821-2-david@xxxxxxxxxx

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb