Re: [PATCH net-next v9 08/15] net: mdiobus: Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy()

From: andy
Date: Tue Jun 15 2021 - 16:16:05 EST


Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 01:53:54PM +0300, Ioana Ciornei kirjoitti:
> From: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy() to register PHYs on the
> mdiobus. From the compatible string, identify whether the PHY is
> c45 and based on this create a PHY device instance which is
> registered on the mdiobus.
>
> Along with fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy() also introduce
> fwnode_find_mii_timestamper() and fwnode_mdiobus_phy_device_register()
> since they are needed.
> While at it, also use the newly introduced fwnode operation in
> of_mdiobus_phy_device_register().

I understand that this patch series is applied, but I think we have a problem
that has to be fixed before the release. See below for the details.

...

> +int fwnode_mdiobus_phy_device_register(struct mii_bus *mdio,
> + struct phy_device *phy,
> + struct fwnode_handle *child, u32 addr)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = fwnode_irq_get(child, 0);
> + if (rc == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return rc;
> +
> + if (rc > 0) {
> + phy->irq = rc;
> + mdio->irq[addr] = rc;
> + } else {
> + phy->irq = mdio->irq[addr];
> + }
> +
> + if (fwnode_property_read_bool(child, "broken-turn-around"))
> + mdio->phy_ignore_ta_mask |= 1 << addr;
> +
> + fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reset-assert-us",
> + &phy->mdio.reset_assert_delay);
> + fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reset-deassert-us",
> + &phy->mdio.reset_deassert_delay);
> +
> + /* Associate the fwnode with the device structure so it
> + * can be looked up later
> + */

> + fwnode_handle_get(child);

We take a reference counting here.
Who and when should drop it?

> + phy->mdio.dev.fwnode = child;
> +
> + /* All data is now stored in the phy struct;
> + * register it
> + */
> + rc = phy_device_register(phy);
> + if (rc) {
> + fwnode_handle_put(child);
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(&mdio->dev, "registered phy %p fwnode at address %i\n",
> + child, addr);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fwnode_mdiobus_phy_device_register);
> +
> +int fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy(struct mii_bus *bus,
> + struct fwnode_handle *child, u32 addr)
> +{
> + struct mii_timestamper *mii_ts = NULL;
> + struct phy_device *phy;
> + bool is_c45 = false;
> + u32 phy_id;
> + int rc;
> +
> + mii_ts = fwnode_find_mii_timestamper(child);
> + if (IS_ERR(mii_ts))
> + return PTR_ERR(mii_ts);
> +
> + rc = fwnode_property_match_string(child, "compatible",
> + "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45");
> + if (rc >= 0)
> + is_c45 = true;
> +
> + if (is_c45 || fwnode_get_phy_id(child, &phy_id))
> + phy = get_phy_device(bus, addr, is_c45);
> + else
> + phy = phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id, 0, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> + unregister_mii_timestamper(mii_ts);
> + return PTR_ERR(phy);
> + }
> +
> + if (is_acpi_node(child)) {
> + phy->irq = bus->irq[addr];
> +
> + /* Associate the fwnode with the device structure so it
> + * can be looked up later.
> + */
> + phy->mdio.dev.fwnode = child;
> +
> + /* All data is now stored in the phy struct, so register it */
> + rc = phy_device_register(phy);
> + if (rc) {
> + phy_device_free(phy);

> + fwnode_handle_put(phy->mdio.dev.fwnode);

We dropped reference counting here, but who and when acquired it?

> + return rc;
> + }
> + } else if (is_of_node(child)) {
> + rc = fwnode_mdiobus_phy_device_register(bus, phy, child, addr);
> + if (rc) {
> + unregister_mii_timestamper(mii_ts);
> + phy_device_free(phy);
> + return rc;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* phy->mii_ts may already be defined by the PHY driver. A
> + * mii_timestamper probed via the device tree will still have
> + * precedence.
> + */
> + if (mii_ts)
> + phy->mii_ts = mii_ts;
> + return 0;
> +}

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko