Re: [PATCH] afs: fix tracepoint string placement with built-in AFS

[David Howells]

Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Looks fine to me, and even saves 4 bytes on 64 bit machines (events are
> rounded up to 4 byte increments, so the u16 is no different than a u32
> here).

Can I put that down as a Reviewed-by?

David