Re: swiotlb/caamjr regression (Was: [GIT PULL] (swiotlb) stable/for-linus-5.12)

['Dominique MARTINET']

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:58:14PM -0400:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 04:48:24PM +0900, 'Dominique MARTINET' wrote:
> > Thanks, that should be good.
> > 
> > Do you want me to send a follow-up patch with the two extra checks
> > (tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE -1)) > swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr)
> > tlb_offset < alloc_size
> > 
> > or are we certain this can't ever happen?
> 
> I would love more patches and I saw the previous one you posted.
> 
> But we only got two (or one) weeks before the next merge window opens
> so I am sending to Linus the one that was tested with NVMe and crypto
> (see above).
> 
> That is the
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/swiotlb.git/commit/?h=stable/for-linus-5.14
> 
> And then after Linus releases the 5.14 - I would love to take your
> cleanup on top of that and test it?

That sounds good to me, will send with proper formatting after release.

-- 
Dominique