Re: [PATCH] net: caif: add a return statement

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed Jun 23 2021 - 06:50:50 EST




On 6/23/21 3:32 AM, 13145886936@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: gushengxian <gushengxian@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Return statement is needed in every condition in Int function.


??? Are you a bot ??

Is it a real patch. How was it tested ?

> Fixed some grammar issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: gushengxian <gushengxian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/caif/caif_socket.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/caif/caif_socket.c b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
> index 3ad0a1df6712..84a00b9cb0dc 100644
> --- a/net/caif/caif_socket.c
> +++ b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
> @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int caif_seqpkt_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
> if (flags & MSG_OOB)
> goto read_error;
>
> - skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, 0 , &ret);
> + skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, 0, &ret);
> if (!skb)
> goto read_error;
> copylen = skb->len;
> @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static int caif_seqpkt_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
> goto out_free;
>
> ret = (flags & MSG_TRUNC) ? skb->len : copylen;
> + return ret;

This is completely bogus.

> out_free:
> skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
> caif_check_flow_release(sk);
> @@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ static int caif_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>
> while (sent < len) {
>
> - size = len-sent;
> + size = len - sent;
>
> if (size > cf_sk->maxframe)
> size = cf_sk->maxframe;
> @@ -815,8 +816,8 @@ static int caif_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
> sock->state = SS_CONNECTING;
> sk->sk_state = CAIF_CONNECTING;
>
> - /* Check priority value comming from socket */
> - /* if priority value is out of range it will be ajusted */
> + /* Check priority value coming from socket */
> + /* if priority value is out of range it will be adjusted */
> if (cf_sk->sk.sk_priority > CAIF_PRIO_MAX)
> cf_sk->conn_req.priority = CAIF_PRIO_MAX;
> else if (cf_sk->sk.sk_priority < CAIF_PRIO_MIN)
>