Re: [PATCH v2 13/24] x86/paravirt: Use PVOP_* for paravirt calls

From: Juergen Gross
Date: Thu Jun 24 2021 - 06:52:19 EST

Next message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: Tree for Jun 24"
Previous message: lijian_8010a29: "[PATCH] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: Fixed the possible null pointer exception issue"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "[PATCH v2 13/24] x86/paravirt: Use PVOP_* for paravirt calls"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "[PATCH v2 02/24] objtool: Introduce CFI hash"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 24.06.21 11:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

Doing unconditional indirect calls through the pv_ops vector is weird.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>

Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Next message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: Tree for Jun 24"
Previous message: lijian_8010a29: "[PATCH] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: Fixed the possible null pointer exception issue"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "[PATCH v2 13/24] x86/paravirt: Use PVOP_* for paravirt calls"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "[PATCH v2 02/24] objtool: Introduce CFI hash"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]