Re: [PATCH 0/9] Refactoring exit
From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Mon Jun 28 2021 - 12:20:41 EST
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hi Michael,
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 1:00 AM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 28/06/21 10:13 am, Al Viro wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:45:23PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>> >> 13) there's bdflush(1, whatever), which is equivalent to exit(0).
>> >> IMO it's long past the time to simply remove the sucker.
>> > Incidentally, calling that from ptraced process on alpha leads to
>> > the same headache for tracer. _If_ we leave it around, this is
>> > another candidate for "hit yourself with that special signal" -
>> > both alpha and m68k have that syscall, and IMO adding an asm
>> > wrapper for that one is over the top.
>> > Said that, we really ought to bury that thing:
>> > commit 2f268ee88abb33968501a44368db55c63adaad40
>> > Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Date: Sat Dec 14 03:16:29 2002 -0800
>> > [PATCH] deprecate use of bdflush()
>> > Patch from Robert Love <rml@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > We can never get rid of it if we do not deprecate it - so do so and
>> > print a stern warning to those who still run bdflush daemons.
>> > Deprecated for 18.5 years by now - I seriously suspect that we have
>> > some contributors younger than that...
>> Haven't found that warning in over 7 years' worth of console logs, and
>> I'm a good candidate for running the oldest userland in existence for m68k.
>> Time to let it go.
> The warning is printed when using filesys-ELF-2.0.x-1400K-2.gz,
> which is a very old ramdisk from right after the m68k a.out to ELF
> warning: process `update' used the obsolete bdflush system call
> Fix your initscripts?
> I still boot it, once in a while.
The only thing left in bdflush is func == 1 calls do_exit(0);
Which is a hack introduced in 2.3.23 aka October of 1999 to force the
userspace process calling bdflush to exit, instead of repeatedly calling
Can you try deleting that func == 1 call and seeing if your old ramdisk
I suspect userspace used to get into a tight spin calling bdflush
func == 1, when that function stopped doing anything. That was back in
1999 so we are probably safe with out it.