Re: [PATCH v2] perf annotate: allow 's' on source code lines

From: Ian Rogers
Date: Tue Jun 29 2021 - 11:00:51 EST


On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 8:53 AM Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 22:37 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 3:37 PM Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > In perf annotate, when 's' is pressed on a line containing
> > > source code, it shows the message "Only available for assembly
> > > lines".
> > > This patch gets rid of the error, moving the cursr to the next
> > > available asm line (or the closest previous one if no asm line
> > > is found moving forwards), before hiding source code lines.
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - handle case of no asm line found in
> > > annotate_browser__find_next_asm_line by returning NULL and
> > > handling error in caller.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c
> > > b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c
> > > index ad0a70f0edaf..f5509a958e38 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c
> > > @@ -343,6 +343,29 @@ static void annotate_browser__calc_percent(struct
> > > annotate_browser *browser,
> > > browser->curr_hot = rb_last(&browser->entries);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static struct annotation_line *annotate_browser__find_next_asm_line(
> > > + struct annotate_browser *browser,
> > > + struct annotation_line *al)
> > > +{
> > > + struct annotation_line *it = al;
> > > +
> > > + /* find next asm line */
> > > + list_for_each_entry_continue(it, browser->b.top, node) {
> > > + if (it->idx_asm >= 0)
> > > + return it;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* no asm line found forwards, try backwards */
> > > + it = al;
> > > + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(it, browser->b.top, node) {
> > > + if (it->idx_asm >= 0)
> > > + return it;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* There are no asm lines */
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static bool annotate_browser__toggle_source(struct annotate_browser
> > > *browser)
> > > {
> > > struct annotation *notes = browser__annotation(&browser->b);
> > > @@ -363,9 +386,12 @@ static bool annotate_browser__toggle_source(struct
> > > annotate_browser *browser)
> > > browser->b.index = al->idx;
> > > } else {
> > > if (al->idx_asm < 0) {
> > > - ui_helpline__puts("Only available for assembly
> > > lines.");
> > > - browser->b.seek(&browser->b, -offset, SEEK_CUR);
> > > - return false;
> > > + /* move cursor to next asm line */
> >
> > comment nit, perhaps prefer "closest" rather than "next" due to
> > searching backward.
>
> The backward search is just a fallback in case the forward one finds no asm
> line, which I believe is unlikely. Maybe it's also impossible, but I don't
> really know how those lines are generated, so I put a fallback in place.
> Furthermore, "closest" would imply that a previous asm line could be chosen over
> a subsequent one if closer, even if the latter is present.
>
> Thanks,
> Riccardo

Agreed, thanks for thinking about this.

Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>

> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> >
> > > + al = annotate_browser__find_next_asm_line(browser,
> > > al);
> > > + if (!al) {
> > > + browser->b.seek(&browser->b, -offset,
> > > SEEK_CUR);
> > > + return false;
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (al->idx_asm < offset)
> > > --
> > > 2.31.1
> > >
>
>