[PATCH bpf-next 1/3] libbpf: avoid use of __int128 in typed dump display

From: Alan Maguire
Date: Mon Jul 19 2021 - 18:23:45 EST


__int128 is not supported for some 32-bit platforms (arm and i386).
__int128 was used in carrying out computations on bitfields which
aid display, but the same calculations could be done with __u64
with the small effect of not supporting 128-bit bitfields.

With these changes, a big-endian issue with casting 128-bit integers
to 64-bit for enum bitfields is solved also, as we now use 64-bit
integers for bitfield calculations.

Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
index accf6fe..4a25512 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
@@ -1552,28 +1552,15 @@ static int btf_dump_unsupported_data(struct btf_dump *d,
return -ENOTSUP;
}

-static void btf_dump_int128(struct btf_dump *d,
- const struct btf_type *t,
- const void *data)
-{
- __int128 num = *(__int128 *)data;
-
- if ((num >> 64) == 0)
- btf_dump_type_values(d, "0x%llx", (long long)num);
- else
- btf_dump_type_values(d, "0x%llx%016llx", (long long)num >> 32,
- (long long)num);
-}
-
-static unsigned __int128 btf_dump_bitfield_get_data(struct btf_dump *d,
- const struct btf_type *t,
- const void *data,
- __u8 bits_offset,
- __u8 bit_sz)
+static __u64 btf_dump_bitfield_get_data(struct btf_dump *d,
+ const struct btf_type *t,
+ const void *data,
+ __u8 bits_offset,
+ __u8 bit_sz)
{
__u16 left_shift_bits, right_shift_bits;
__u8 nr_copy_bits, nr_copy_bytes;
- unsigned __int128 num = 0, ret;
+ __u64 num = 0, ret;
const __u8 *bytes = data;
int i;

@@ -1591,8 +1578,8 @@ static unsigned __int128 btf_dump_bitfield_get_data(struct btf_dump *d,
#else
# error "Unrecognized __BYTE_ORDER__"
#endif
- left_shift_bits = 128 - nr_copy_bits;
- right_shift_bits = 128 - bit_sz;
+ left_shift_bits = 64 - nr_copy_bits;
+ right_shift_bits = 64 - bit_sz;

ret = (num << left_shift_bits) >> right_shift_bits;

@@ -1605,7 +1592,7 @@ static int btf_dump_bitfield_check_zero(struct btf_dump *d,
__u8 bits_offset,
__u8 bit_sz)
{
- __int128 check_num;
+ __u64 check_num;

check_num = btf_dump_bitfield_get_data(d, t, data, bits_offset, bit_sz);
if (check_num == 0)
@@ -1619,10 +1606,11 @@ static int btf_dump_bitfield_data(struct btf_dump *d,
__u8 bits_offset,
__u8 bit_sz)
{
- unsigned __int128 print_num;
+ __u64 print_num;

print_num = btf_dump_bitfield_get_data(d, t, data, bits_offset, bit_sz);
- btf_dump_int128(d, t, &print_num);
+
+ btf_dump_type_values(d, "0x%llx", (unsigned long long)print_num);

return 0;
}
@@ -1681,9 +1669,29 @@ static int btf_dump_int_data(struct btf_dump *d,
return btf_dump_bitfield_data(d, t, data, 0, 0);

switch (sz) {
- case 16:
- btf_dump_int128(d, t, data);
+ case 16: {
+ const __u64 *ints = data;
+ __u64 lsi, msi;
+
+ /* avoid use of __int128 as some 32-bit platforms do not
+ * support it.
+ */
+#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ lsi = ints[0];
+ msi = ints[1];
+#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
+ lsi = ints[1];
+ msi = ints[0];
+#else
+# error "Unrecognized __BYTE_ORDER__"
+#endif
+ if (msi == 0)
+ btf_dump_type_values(d, "0x%llx", (unsigned long long)lsi);
+ else
+ btf_dump_type_values(d, "0x%llx%016llx", (unsigned long long)msi,
+ (unsigned long long)lsi);
break;
+ }
case 8:
if (sign)
btf_dump_type_values(d, "%lld", *(long long *)data);
@@ -2209,7 +2217,7 @@ static int btf_dump_dump_type_data(struct btf_dump *d,
case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
/* handle bitfield and int enum values */
if (bit_sz) {
- unsigned __int128 print_num;
+ __u64 print_num;
__s64 enum_val;

print_num = btf_dump_bitfield_get_data(d, t, data, bits_offset, bit_sz);
--
1.8.3.1