[PATCH v6 4/5] pwm: mtk_disp: fix overflow in period and duty calcalation

From: Jitao Shi
Date: Sat Jul 24 2021 - 04:19:15 EST


Current calculation for period and high_width may have
64-bit overflow. state->period and rate are u64.
rate * state->period will overflow.

clk_div = div_u64(rate * state->period, NSEC_PER_SEC)
period = div64_u64(rate * state->period, div);
high_width = div64_u64(rate * state->duty_cycle, div);

This patch is to resolve it by using mul_u64_u64_div_u64().

Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
index 599d7dd8ecab..4f6de6f24484 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
* high_width = (PWM_CLK_RATE * duty_ns) / (10^9 * (clk_div + 1))
*/
rate = clk_get_rate(mdp->clk_main);
- clk_div = div_u64(rate * state->period, NSEC_PER_SEC) >>
+ clk_div = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->period, rate, NSEC_PER_SEC) >>
PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH;
if (clk_div > PWM_CLKDIV_MAX) {
if (!mdp->enabled) {
@@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
}

div = NSEC_PER_SEC * (clk_div + 1);
- period = div64_u64(rate * state->period, div);
+ period = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->period, rate, div);
if (period > 0)
period--;

- high_width = div64_u64(rate * state->duty_cycle, div);
+ high_width = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->duty_cycle, rate, div);
value = period | (high_width << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT);

mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
--
2.25.1