Re: [PATCH 33/64] lib: Introduce CONFIG_TEST_MEMCPY

[Randy Dunlap]

On 7/27/21 4:31 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 7/27/21 1:58 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> +static int __init test_memcpy_init(void)
>> +{
>> +    int err = 0;
>> +
>> +    err |= test_memcpy();
>> +    err |= test_memmove();
>> +    err |= test_memset();
>> +
>> +    if (err) {
>> +        pr_warn("FAIL!\n");
>> +        err = -EINVAL;
>> +    } else {
>> +        pr_info("all tests passed\n");
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit test_memcpy_exit(void)
>> +{ }
>> +
>> +module_init(test_memcpy_init);
>> +module_exit(test_memcpy_exit);
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 
> Has it been considered to implement this test using the Kunit framework?

and do we want everything converted to use the Kunit test framework?

My answer is No, we don't, but I could easily be in the minority.

-- 
~Randy