Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] soc: mediatek: mmsys: Add reset controller support for MT8195 vdosys1

From: Enric Balletbo Serra
Date: Wed Jul 28 2021 - 06:32:53 EST

Next message: Colin King: "[PATCH] ms_block: Fix spelling contraction "cant" -> "can't""
Previous message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH] net: netfilter: Fix port selection of FTP for NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Nancy,

Missatge de Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> del dia dc., 28 de jul.
2021 a les 8:01:
>
> Hi Enric,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 12:57 +0200, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> > Hi Nancy,
> >
> > Thank you for your patch.
> >
> > Missatge de Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> del dia dj., 22 de
> > jul.
> > 2021 a les 11:46:
> > >
> > > Among other features the mmsys driver should implement a reset
> > > controller to be able to reset different bits from their space.
> > >
> >
> > I'm working on a series that does the same, it should be nice if we
> > can coordinate [1]
> >
> > [1]
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=515355__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!xP6Ko9hF-3KasGgr7-8Aby_tCwiU2M6gFBAngDLVcJjzooj-MEeTcNG8cf2e9wGb$
> >
> >
> OK, I will add this series to my reference base in the next patch
> revision.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c | 77
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
> > > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
> > > index 4bdb2087250c..a7f6e275bfe5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
> > > @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@
> > > #define DISP_DP_INTF0_SEL_IN_FROM_VDO0_MERGE_DL_ASYNC_MOUT (1
> > > << 0)
> > > #define DISP_DP_INTF0_SEL_IN_FROM_VDO0_DSC_DL_ASYNC_MOUT (2
> > > << 0)
> > >
> > > +#define MT8195_VDO1_SW0_RST_B 0x1d0
> > > #define MT8195_VDO1_MERGE0_ASYNC_CFG_WD 0xe30
> > > #define MT8195_VDO1_MERGE1_ASYNC_CFG_WD 0xe40
> > > #define MT8195_VDO1_MERGE2_ASYNC_CFG_WD 0xe50
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > > index d0f4a407f8f8..1ae04efeadab 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > > @@ -4,10 +4,12 @@
> > > * Author: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > */
> > >
> > > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > > #include <linux/device.h>
> > > #include <linux/io.h>
> > > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> > > #include <linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h>
> > >
> > > #include "mtk-mmsys.h"
> > > @@ -15,6 +17,8 @@
> > > #include "mt8183-mmsys.h"
> > > #include "mt8195-mmsys.h"
> > >
> > > +#define MMSYS_SW_RESET_PER_REG 32
> > > +
> > > static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data mt2701_mmsys_driver_data
> > > = {
> > > .clk_driver = "clk-mt2701-mm",
> > > .routes = mmsys_default_routing_table,
> > > @@ -65,12 +69,15 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data
> > > mt8195_vdosys1_driver_data = {
> > > .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8195_routing_table),
> > > .config = mmsys_mt8195_config_table,
> > > .num_configs = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8195_config_table),
> > > + .sw_reset_start = MT8195_VDO1_SW0_RST_B,
> >
> > That change is interesting and I think I should also take it into
> > consideration with my series.
> >
> > > };
> > >
> > > struct mtk_mmsys {
> > > void __iomem *regs;
> > > struct cmdq_client_reg cmdq_base;
> > > const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data *data;
> > > + spinlock_t lock; /* protects mmsys_sw_rst_b reg */
> >
> > Seems that mmsys_sw_rst_b reg has different names for different SoCs?
> > I mean I know that for MT8173 and MT8183 the register is called
> > mmsys_sw0_rst_b but looks like for MT8195 the name is vdo1_sw0_rst_b?
> > So maybe we should update this comment to be more generic.
> >
> Yes, the name of MT8195 vdosys1 sw reset is called VDOSYS1_SW0_RST_B
> and the name of vdosys0 sw reset is called GLOBAL0_SW0_RST_B. They have
> a different name. Maybe we can change the comment to "protects mmsys sw
> reset reg".
>
> > >
>
> > > + struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
> > > };
> > >
> > > void mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect(struct device *dev,
> > > @@ -148,6 +155,63 @@ void mtk_mmsys_ddp_config(struct device *dev,
> > > enum mtk_mmsys_config_type config,
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mmsys_ddp_config);
> > >
> > > +static int mtk_mmsys_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev
> > > *rcdev, unsigned long id,
> > > + bool assert)
> > > +{
> > > + struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = container_of(rcdev, struct
> > > mtk_mmsys, rcdev);
> > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > + u32 reg;
> > > + int i;
> > > + u32 offset;
> > > +
> > > + offset = (id / MMSYS_SW_RESET_PER_REG) * sizeof(u32);
> > > + id = 1 << (id % MMSYS_SW_RESET_PER_REG);
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&mmsys->lock, flags);
> > > +
> > > + reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + mmsys->data-
> > > >sw_reset_start + offset);
> > > +
> > > + if (assert)
> > > + reg &= ~BIT(id);
> > > + else
> > > + reg |= BIT(id);
> > > +
> > > + writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + mmsys->data-
> > > >sw_reset_start + offset);
> > > +
> > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mmsys->lock, flags);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int mtk_mmsys_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev
> > > *rcdev, unsigned long id)
> > > +{
> > > + return mtk_mmsys_reset_update(rcdev, id, true);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int mtk_mmsys_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev
> > > *rcdev, unsigned long id)
> > > +{
> > > + return mtk_mmsys_reset_update(rcdev, id, false);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int mtk_mmsys_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> > > unsigned long id)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = mtk_mmsys_reset_assert(rcdev, id);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + usleep_range(1000, 1100);
> > > +
> >
> > One question that I received in my series, and I couldn't answer
> > because I don't have the datasheet, is if
> > is this known to be enough for all IP cores that can be reset by this
> > controller? Is this time specified in the datasheet?
>
> It only takes few cycles for the reset. The 1000us is enough for the
> reset to take effect.
>

Saying enough looks to me that 1000us is a random number, is there any
specific real number in the datasheet?

Note that I'm not against it, just want to make sure the number makes sense.

> > > + return mtk_mmsys_reset_deassert(rcdev, id);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const struct reset_control_ops mtk_mmsys_reset_ops = {
> > > + .assert = mtk_mmsys_reset_assert,
> > > + .deassert = mtk_mmsys_reset_deassert,
> > > + .reset = mtk_mmsys_reset,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static int mtk_mmsys_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > @@ -174,6 +238,19 @@ static int mtk_mmsys_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > if (ret)
> > > dev_dbg(dev, "No mediatek,gce-client-reg!\n");
> > > #endif
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_init(&mmsys->lock);
> > > +
> > > + mmsys->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > > + mmsys->rcdev.nr_resets = 64;
> >
> > Is the number of resets 64 for MT8195? I think is 32 for MT8173 and
> > MT8183. Can you confirm?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Enric
> >
> The number of resets in MT8195 vdosys1 is 64 (43 resets are used, 21
> are not used).
>

Ok, thanks for the information.

> > > + mmsys->rcdev.ops = &mtk_mmsys_reset_ops;
> > > + mmsys->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > + ret = devm_reset_controller_register(&pdev->dev, &mmsys-
> > > >rcdev);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't register mmsys reset
> > > controller: %d\n", ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mmsys);
> > >
> > > clks = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev, mmsys-
> > > >data->clk_driver,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> > > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> > > index 084b1f5f3c88..cc57c3895c51 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> > > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data {
> > > const unsigned int num_routes;
> > > const struct mtk_mmsys_config *config;
> > > const unsigned int num_configs;
> > > + u32 sw_reset_start;
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > --
> > > 2.18.0
> > >

Next message: Colin King: "[PATCH] ms_block: Fix spelling contraction "cant" -> "can't""
Previous message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH] net: netfilter: Fix port selection of FTP for NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]