Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Don't report SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV in sched_getattr()

[Juri Lelli]

On 28/07/21 10:39, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 Jul 2021 at 11:12:03 (+0200), Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi Quentin,
> > 
> > On 27/07/21 11:11, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > > SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV is supposed to be a kernel-only flag that userspace
> > > cannot interact with. However, sched_getattr() currently reports it
> > > in sched_flags if called on a sugov worker even though it is not
> > > actually defined in a UAPI header. To avoid this, make sure to
> > > clean-up the sched_flags field in sched_getattr() before returning to
> > > userspace.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/sched/core.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > index 2d9ff40f4661..d8f489dcc383 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > @@ -7535,6 +7535,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
> > >  		kattr.sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
> > >  	else
> > >  		kattr.sched_nice = task_nice(p);
> > > +	kattr.sched_flags &= SCHED_FLAG_ALL;
> > 
> > Maybe we can do this in the previous patch so that it's kept confined to
> > deadline bits?
> 
> That works too, it just felt like this could happen again if we start
> using non-standard flags outside of deadline for any reason at some
> point in the future. But no strong opinion really.

Yeah, I also see this point. :)

So no prob with me to keep it in core.c as you do here.

Best,
Juri