Re: [PATCH v10 2/8] PCI: Add new array for keeping track of ordering of reset methods

[Amey Narkhede]

On 21/07/27 05:59PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 06:08:07PM +0530, Amey Narkhede wrote:
> > Introduce a new array reset_methods in struct pci_dev to keep track of
> > reset mechanisms supported by the device and their ordering.
> >
> > Also refactor probing and reset functions to take advantage of calling
> > convention of reset functions.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pci.c   | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  drivers/pci/pci.h   |  9 ++++-
> >  drivers/pci/probe.c |  5 +--
> >  include/linux/pci.h |  7 ++++
> >  4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >
>
[...]
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(pci_reset_fn_methods) != PCI_NUM_RESET_METHODS);
> >
> >  	might_sleep();
> >
> > -	rc = pci_dev_specific_reset(dev, 1);
> > -	if (rc != -ENOTTY)
> > -		return rc;
> > -	rc = pcie_reset_flr(dev, 1);
> > -	if (rc != -ENOTTY)
> > -		return rc;
> > -	rc = pci_af_flr(dev, 1);
> > -	if (rc != -ENOTTY)
> > -		return rc;
> > -	rc = pci_pm_reset(dev, 1);
> > -	if (rc != -ENOTTY)
> > -		return rc;
> > +	for (i = 1; i < PCI_NUM_RESET_METHODS; i++) {
> > +		rc = pci_reset_fn_methods[i].reset_fn(dev, 1);
> > +		if (!rc)
> > +			reset_methods[n++] = i;
>
> Why do we need this local reset_methods[] array?  Can we just fill
> in dev->reset_methods[] directly and skip the memcpy() below?
>
This is for avoiding caching of previously supported reset methods.
Is it okay if I use memset(dev->reset_methods, 0,
sizeof(dev->reset_methods)) instead to clear the values in
dev->reset_methods?

Thanks,
Amey
> > +		else if (rc != -ENOTTY)
> > +			break;
> > +	}
> >
> > -	return pci_reset_bus_function(dev, 1);
> > +	memcpy(dev->reset_methods, reset_methods, sizeof(reset_methods));
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
[...]