[PATCH 1/1] fs: pipe: wakeup readers everytime new data written is to pipe

[Sandeep Patil]

commit '1b6b26ae7053 ("pipe: fix and clarify pipe write wakeup logic")'
changed pipe_write() to wakeup readers only if the pipe was empty.
Prior to this change, threads waiting in epoll_wait(EPOLLET | EPOLLIN)
on non-empty pipes would get woken up on new data.

It meant an applications that,
   1. used pipe + epoll for notifications between threads / processes
   2. Didn't drain the pipe on each epoll wakeup unless the pipe was full
started to experience hang / timeouts in threads stuck in epoll_wait()

So restore the old behavior to wakeup all readers if any new data is
written to the pipe.

Fixes: 1b6b26ae7053 ("pipe: fix and clarify pipe write wakeup logic")
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/pipe.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index bfd946a9ad01..dda22a316bb3 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	ssize_t ret = 0;
 	size_t total_len = iov_iter_count(from);
 	ssize_t chars;
-	bool was_empty = false;
+	bool do_wakeup = false;
 	bool wake_next_writer = false;
 
 	/* Null write succeeds. */
@@ -429,10 +429,11 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 #endif
 
 	/*
-	 * Only wake up if the pipe started out empty, since
-	 * otherwise there should be no readers waiting.
+	 * Wake up readers if the pipe was written to. Regardless
+	 * of whether it was empty or not. Otherwise, threads
+	 * waiting with EPOLLET will hang until the pipe is emptied.
 	 *
-	 * If it wasn't empty we try to merge new data into
+	 * If pipe wasn't empty we try to merge new data into
 	 * the last buffer.
 	 *
 	 * That naturally merges small writes, but it also
@@ -440,9 +441,8 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	 * spanning multiple pages.
 	 */
 	head = pipe->head;
-	was_empty = pipe_empty(head, pipe->tail);
 	chars = total_len & (PAGE_SIZE-1);
-	if (chars && !was_empty) {
+	if (chars && !pipe_empty(head, pipe->tail)) {
 		unsigned int mask = pipe->ring_size - 1;
 		struct pipe_buffer *buf = &pipe->bufs[(head - 1) & mask];
 		int offset = buf->offset + buf->len;
@@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 			}
 
 			buf->len += ret;
+			do_wakeup = true;
 			if (!iov_iter_count(from))
 				goto out;
 		}
@@ -526,6 +527,7 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 			ret += copied;
 			buf->offset = 0;
 			buf->len = copied;
+			do_wakeup = true;
 
 			if (!iov_iter_count(from))
 				break;
@@ -553,13 +555,12 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 		 * become empty while we dropped the lock.
 		 */
 		__pipe_unlock(pipe);
-		if (was_empty) {
+		if (do_wakeup) {
 			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->rd_wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
 			kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
 		}
 		wait_event_interruptible_exclusive(pipe->wr_wait, pipe_writable(pipe));
 		__pipe_lock(pipe);
-		was_empty = pipe_empty(pipe->head, pipe->tail);
 		wake_next_writer = true;
 	}
 out:
@@ -576,7 +577,7 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	 * how (for example) the GNU make jobserver uses small writes to
 	 * wake up pending jobs
 	 */
-	if (was_empty) {
+	if (do_wakeup) {
 		wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->rd_wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
 		kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
 	}
-- 
2.32.0.554.ge1b32706d8-goog