Re: [PATCH printk v1 01/10] printk: relocate printk cpulock functions

From: Petr Mladek
Date: Wed Aug 04 2021 - 05:25:01 EST

Next message: Qi Liu: "[PATCH v2] arm64: kprobe: Enable OPTPROBE for arm64"
Previous message: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu: "[PATCH v4 3/4] clk: visconti: Add support common clock driver and reset driver"
In reply to: John Ogness: "[PATCH printk v1 01/10] printk: relocate printk cpulock functions"
Next in thread: John Ogness: "[PATCH printk v1 06/10] printk: use seqcount_latch for console_seq"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue 2021-08-03 15:18:52, John Ogness wrote:
> Move the printk cpulock functions "as is" further up so that they
> can be used by other printk.c functions in an upcoming commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>

Best Regards,
Petr

Next message: Qi Liu: "[PATCH v2] arm64: kprobe: Enable OPTPROBE for arm64"
Previous message: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu: "[PATCH v4 3/4] clk: visconti: Add support common clock driver and reset driver"
In reply to: John Ogness: "[PATCH printk v1 01/10] printk: relocate printk cpulock functions"
Next in thread: John Ogness: "[PATCH printk v1 06/10] printk: use seqcount_latch for console_seq"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]