RE: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] scsi: ufs: introduce vendor isr

[Avri Altman]

> 
> On 8/5/21 11:34 PM, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
> > This patch is to activate some interrupt sources
> > that aren't defined in UFSHCI specifications. Those
> > purpose could be error handling, workaround or whatever.
> 
> How about extending the UFS spec instead of adding a non-standard
> mechanism in a driver that is otherwise based on a standard?
The variant ops IMO (which he rightfully used), should allow that extra freedom.

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.