Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] genirq: Let purely flow-masked ONESHOT irqs through unmask_threaded_irq()

[Marc Zyngier]

On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:50:02 +0100,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> A subsequent patch will let IRQs end up in irq_finalize_oneshot() without
> IRQD_IRQ_MASKED, but with IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED set instead. Let such IRQs
> receive their final ->irq_eoi().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> index ef30b4762947..e6d6d32ddcbc 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static void irq_finalize_oneshot(struct irq_desc *desc,
>  	desc->threads_oneshot &= ~action->thread_mask;
>  
>  	if (!desc->threads_oneshot && !irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) &&
> -	    irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data))
> +	    (irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data) | irqd_irq_flow_masked(&desc->irq_data)))
>  		unmask_threaded_irq(desc);

The bitwise OR looks pretty odd. It is probably fine given that both
side of the expression are bool, but still. I can fix this locally.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.