Re: [PATCH] f2fs: always call f2fs_issue_checkpoint() in f2fs_sync_fs()

[Jaegeuk Kim]

On 08/16, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Sync is always 1, so delete the check of the value.

I don't think so.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/super.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 98727e04d271..b823c7e3f303 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -1553,7 +1553,6 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
>  int f2fs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int sync)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(sb);
> -	int err = 0;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1565,10 +1564,7 @@ int f2fs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int sync)
>  	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
>  		return -EAGAIN;
>  
> -	if (sync)
> -		err = f2fs_issue_checkpoint(sbi);
> -
> -	return err;
> +	return f2fs_issue_checkpoint(sbi);
>  }
>  
>  static int f2fs_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
> -- 
> 2.32.0