Re: [PATCH net-next v5] skb_expand_head() adjust skb->truesize incorrectly

From: Vasily Averin
Date: Thu Sep 02 2021 - 12:32:25 EST


On 9/2/21 6:53 PM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 4:12 AM Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Christoph Paasch reports [1] about incorrect skb->truesize
>> after skb_expand_head() call in ip6_xmit.
>> This may happen because of two reasons:
>> - skb_set_owner_w() for newly cloned skb is called too early,
>> before pskb_expand_head() where truesize is adjusted for (!skb-sk) case.
>> - pskb_expand_head() does not adjust truesize in (skb->sk) case.
>> In this case sk->sk_wmem_alloc should be adjusted too.
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/20/1082
>>
>> Fixes: f1260ff15a71 ("skbuff: introduce skb_expand_head()")
>> Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v5: fixed else condition, thanks to Eric
>> reworked update of expanded skb,
>> added corresponding comments
>> v4: decided to use is_skb_wmem() after pskb_expand_head() call
>> fixed 'return (EXPRESSION);' in os_skb_wmem according to Eric Dumazet
>> v3: removed __pskb_expand_head(),
>> added is_skb_wmem() helper for skb with wmem-compatible destructors
>> there are 2 ways to use it:
>> - before pskb_expand_head(), to create skb clones
>> - after successfull pskb_expand_head() to change owner on extended skb.
>> v2: based on patch version from Eric Dumazet,
>> added __pskb_expand_head() function, which can be forced
>> to adjust skb->truesize and sk->sk_wmem_alloc.
>> ---
>> include/net/sock.h | 1 +
>> net/core/skbuff.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> net/core/sock.c | 8 +++++++
>> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Still the same issues around refcount as I reported in my other email.
>
> Did you try running the syzkaller reproducer on your setup?

no, I do not have

>> + } else if (sk && skb->destructor != sock_edemux) {
>> + bool ref, set_owner;
>> +
>> + ref = false; set_owner = false;
>> + delta = osize - skb_end_offset(skb);

error is here, should be instead
delta = skb_end_offset(skb) - osize;

>> + /* skb_set_owner_w() calls current skb destructor.
>> + * It can decrease sk_wmem_alloc to 0 and release sk,
>> + * To prevnt it we increase sk_wmem_alloc earlier.
>> + * Another kind of destructors can release last sk_refcnt,
>> + * so it will be impossible to call sock_hold for !fullsock
>> + * Take extra sk_refcnt to prevent it.
>> + * Otherwise just increase truesize of expanded skb.
>> + */
>> + refcount_add(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
>> + if (!is_skb_wmem(skb)) {
>> + set_owner = true;
>> + if (!sk_fullsock(sk) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)) {
>> + /* skb_set_owner_w can set sock_edemux */
>> + ref = refcount_inc_not_zero(&sk->sk_refcnt);
>> + if (!ref) {
>> + set_owner = false;
>> + WARN_ON(refcount_sub_and_test(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc));
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (set_owner)
>> + skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>> + if (skb->destructor == sock_edemux) {
>> + WARN_ON(refcount_sub_and_test(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc));
>> + if (ref)
>> + WARN_ON(refcount_dec_and_test(&sk->sk_refcnt));
>> + }
>> +#endif
>> + skb->truesize += delta;
>> }
>> return skb;
>> }
>> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
>> index 950f1e7..6cbda43 100644
>> --- a/net/core/sock.c
>> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
>> @@ -2227,6 +2227,14 @@ void skb_set_owner_w(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_set_owner_w);
>>
>> +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + return skb->destructor == sock_wfree ||
>> + skb->destructor == __sock_wfree ||
>> + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) && skb->destructor == tcp_wfree);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_skb_wmem);
>> +
>> static bool can_skb_orphan_partial(const struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>