Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] clk: rockchip: rk3399: expose PCLK_COREDBG_{B,L}

From: Chen-Yu Tsai
Date: Wed Sep 08 2021 - 01:01:09 EST


On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 12:46 AM Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We have DT IDs for PCLK_COREDBG_L and PCLK_COREDBG_B, but we don't
> actually expose them.
>
> In exposing these clocks (and attaching them to the coresight debug
> driver), the AMBA bus may start to disable them. Because no CPU driver
> owns these clocks (e.g., cpufreq-dt doesn't enable() them -- and even if
> it did, it's not early enough -- nor does arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c), the
> common clock framework then feels the need to disable the parents
> (including the CPU PLLs) -- which is no fun for anyone.
>
> Thus, mark the CPU clocks as critical as well.

I think this part should be done regardless, and could be a separate patch
added before exposing the COREDBG clks.

Either way,

Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Resending, because I missed the mailing lists on the first version.
>
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> index 62a4f2543960..53ed5cca335b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = {
> COMPOSITE_NOMUX(0, "atclk_core_l", "armclkl", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(1), 0, 5, DFLAGS | CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY,
> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(0), 5, GFLAGS),
> - COMPOSITE_NOMUX(0, "pclk_dbg_core_l", "armclkl", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> + COMPOSITE_NOMUX(PCLK_COREDBG_L, "pclk_dbg_core_l", "armclkl", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(1), 8, 5, DFLAGS | CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY,
> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(0), 6, GFLAGS),
>
> @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = {
> GATE(ACLK_GIC_ADB400_CORE_B_2_GIC, "aclk_core_adb400_core_b_2_gic", "armclkb", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(14), 4, GFLAGS),
>
> - DIV(0, "pclken_dbg_core_b", "pclk_dbg_core_b", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> + DIV(PCLK_COREDBG_B, "pclken_dbg_core_b", "pclk_dbg_core_b", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(3), 13, 2, DFLAGS | CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
>
> GATE(0, "pclk_dbg_cxcs_pd_core_b", "pclk_dbg_core_b", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> @@ -1514,7 +1514,10 @@ static const char *const rk3399_cru_critical_clocks[] __initconst = {
> "aclk_vio_noc",
>
> /* ddrc */
> - "sclk_ddrc"
> + "sclk_ddrc",
> +
> + "armclkl",
> + "armclkb",
> };
>
> static const char *const rk3399_pmucru_critical_clocks[] __initconst = {
> @@ -1549,9 +1552,6 @@ static void __init rk3399_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
> rockchip_clk_register_branches(ctx, rk3399_clk_branches,
> ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_clk_branches));
>
> - rockchip_clk_protect_critical(rk3399_cru_critical_clocks,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_cru_critical_clocks));
> -
> rockchip_clk_register_armclk(ctx, ARMCLKL, "armclkl",
> mux_armclkl_p, ARRAY_SIZE(mux_armclkl_p),
> &rk3399_cpuclkl_data, rk3399_cpuclkl_rates,
> @@ -1562,6 +1562,9 @@ static void __init rk3399_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
> &rk3399_cpuclkb_data, rk3399_cpuclkb_rates,
> ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_cpuclkb_rates));
>
> + rockchip_clk_protect_critical(rk3399_cru_critical_clocks,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_cru_critical_clocks));
> +

Looking at the bigger picture, maybe it's time to convert CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED
and rockchip_clk_protect_critical() to CLK_IS_CRITICAL?

ChenYu

> rockchip_register_softrst(np, 21, reg_base + RK3399_SOFTRST_CON(0),
> ROCKCHIP_SOFTRST_HIWORD_MASK);
>
> --
> 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
>