Re: [PATCH] riscv: mm: don't advertise 1 num_asid for 0 asid bits

From: Anup Patel
Date: Wed Sep 08 2021 - 04:35:41 EST


On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:33 AM Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Even if mmu doesn't support ASID, current code calculates @num_asids=1
> which is misleading, so avoid setting any asid related variables in such
> a case.
>
> Also while here, print the number of asid bits discovered even for the
> disabled case.
>
> Verified this on Hifive Unmatched.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/mm/context.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> index ee3459cb6750..c8c6f8831a3b 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> @@ -233,8 +233,10 @@ static int __init asids_init(void)
> local_flush_tlb_all();
>
> /* Pre-compute ASID details */
> - num_asids = 1 << asid_bits;
> - asid_mask = num_asids - 1;
> + if (asid_bits) {
> + num_asids = 1 << asid_bits;
> + asid_mask = num_asids - 1;
> + }
>
> /*
> * Use ASID allocator only if number of HW ASIDs are
> @@ -255,7 +257,7 @@ static int __init asids_init(void)
> pr_info("ASID allocator using %lu bits (%lu entries)\n",
> asid_bits, num_asids);
> } else {
> - pr_info("ASID allocator disabled\n");
> + pr_info("ASID allocator disabled: %lu bits\n", asid_bits);

May be use:

pr_info("ASID allocator disabled (%lu bits)\n", asid_bits);

for consistency with the ASID enabled case.

Otherwise, it looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Regards,
Anup