Re: [PATCH resend RFC 7/9] s390/mm: no need for pte_alloc_map_lock() if we know the pmd is present

From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Tue Sep 14 2021 - 13:23:44 EST


On 14.09.21 18:54, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:22:46 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

pte_map_lock() is sufficient.

Can you explain the difference and why it is enough?

I didn't repeat the $subject:

"No need for pte_alloc_map_lock() if we know the pmd is present; pte_map_lock() is sufficient, because there isn't anything to allocate."



Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c | 15 +++------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
index 5fb409ff7842..4e77b8ebdcc5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -814,10 +814,7 @@ int set_guest_storage_key(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
}
spin_unlock(ptl);
- ptep = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmdp, addr, &ptl);
- if (unlikely(!ptep))
- return -EFAULT;
-
+ ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmdp, addr, &ptl);
new = old = pgste_get_lock(ptep);
pgste_val(new) &= ~(PGSTE_GR_BIT | PGSTE_GC_BIT |
PGSTE_ACC_BITS | PGSTE_FP_BIT);
@@ -912,10 +909,7 @@ int reset_guest_reference_bit(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
}
spin_unlock(ptl);
- ptep = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmdp, addr, &ptl);
- if (unlikely(!ptep))
- return -EFAULT;
-
+ ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmdp, addr, &ptl);
new = old = pgste_get_lock(ptep);
/* Reset guest reference bit only */
pgste_val(new) &= ~PGSTE_GR_BIT;
@@ -977,10 +971,7 @@ int get_guest_storage_key(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
}
spin_unlock(ptl);
- ptep = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmdp, addr, &ptl);
- if (unlikely(!ptep))
- return -EFAULT;
-
+ ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmdp, addr, &ptl);
pgste = pgste_get_lock(ptep);
*key = (pgste_val(pgste) & (PGSTE_ACC_BITS | PGSTE_FP_BIT)) >> 56;
paddr = pte_val(*ptep) & PAGE_MASK;



--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb