Re: [GIT pull] x86/urgent for v5.15-rc3

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Tue Sep 28 2021 - 18:44:35 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "[dborkman-bpf:pr/bpf-tstamp 3/3] include/net/tcp.h:812:27: error: no member named 'skb_mstamp_ns' in 'struct sk_buff'"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Always inline is_percpu_thread()"
In reply to: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [GIT pull] x86/urgent for v5.15-rc3"
Next in thread: Borislav Petkov: "[PATCH] x86/insn: Use get_unaligned() instead of memcpy()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 1:41 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Bah, I got carried away with the axe...
>
> And looka here: 1d509f2a6ebc ("x86/insn: Support big endian cross-compiles")

Ahh. s390. For some reason I thought they were LE too, clearly
incorrectly. So yeah, there still are serious big BE machines that you
might want to cross-compile from.

Linus

Next message: kernel test robot: "[dborkman-bpf:pr/bpf-tstamp 3/3] include/net/tcp.h:812:27: error: no member named 'skb_mstamp_ns' in 'struct sk_buff'"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Always inline is_percpu_thread()"
In reply to: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [GIT pull] x86/urgent for v5.15-rc3"
Next in thread: Borislav Petkov: "[PATCH] x86/insn: Use get_unaligned() instead of memcpy()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]