Re: [PATCH 6/7] arch: __get_wchan || STACKTRACE_SUPPORT

[Josh Poimboeuf]

On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 03:45:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > stack_trace_save_tsk() *shouldn't* skip anything unless we've explicitly
> > told it to via skipnr, because I'd expect that
> 
> It's what most archs happen to do today and is what
> stack_trace_save_tsk() as implemented using arch_stack_walk() does.
> Which is I think the closest to canonical we have.

It *is* confusing though.  Even if 'nosched' may be the normally
desired behavior, stack_trace_save_tsk() should probably be named
stack_trace_save_tsk_nosched().

-- 
Josh