Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: simplify the if condition

From: Hans de Goede
Date: Sat Oct 09 2021 - 12:51:31 EST


Hi,

On 10/9/21 8:00 AM, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> if psta is NULL, function is returning with fail. On next if condition
> again checking if psta is not a NULL. Remove multiple if condition check.
>
> Function is already using goto exit statement to exit.Replace multiple
> return with goto exit statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 61 ++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
> index 34505b35a7f3..4e4a1bed882b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
> @@ -932,49 +932,40 @@ s32 rtw_make_wlanhdr(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *hdr, struct pkt_attrib *pattr
> /* TODO: fill HT Control Field */
>
> /* Update Seq Num will be handled by f/w */
> - {
> - struct sta_info *psta;
> -
> - psta = rtw_get_stainfo(&padapter->stapriv, pattrib->ra);
> - if (pattrib->psta != psta)
> - return _FAIL;
> -
> - if (!psta)
> - return _FAIL;
> + struct sta_info *psta;

You are now declaring a variable after some statements, this will
cause a compiler warning in some cases. Please move this variable
declaration up, grouping it together with the other variable
declarations.

>
> - if (!(psta->state & _FW_LINKED))
> - return _FAIL;
> + psta = rtw_get_stainfo(&padapter->stapriv, pattrib->ra);
> + if (!psta || pattrib->psta != psta || !(psta->state & _FW_LINKED))
> + res = _FAIL;
> + goto exit;

You are both removing an identation level here because you are removing
the compound statement which contained the psta declaration as well
as refactoring the code.

Please split this into 2 separate commits, 1 where you only drop the
extra indentation level (and move the psta declaration up).

And then a separate commit which just the actual code changes.

Your current patch is very hard to review because you are doing
2 things at once.

Also it looks like this patch depends on your previous patch:
"[PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: remove empty else section"

When patches depend on each other please send them together
as a single patch series. E.g. for version 2 (v2) of a 3 patch
series consisting of the last 3 commits in your local tree use
(so the next version of these patches) use:

git format-patch -v2 --cover-letter HEAD~3
$editor v2-0000-cover-letter.patch
<describe series contents + what was changed in the cover-letter>
git send-email v2-00*.patch

Regards,

Hans


>
> - if (psta) {
> - psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority]++;
> - psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority] &= 0xFFF;
> - pattrib->seqnum = psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority];
> + psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority]++;
> + psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority] &= 0xFFF;
> + pattrib->seqnum = psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority];
>
> - SetSeqNum(hdr, pattrib->seqnum);
> + SetSeqNum(hdr, pattrib->seqnum);
>
> - /* check if enable ampdu */
> - if (pattrib->ht_en && psta->htpriv.ampdu_enable)
> - if (psta->htpriv.agg_enable_bitmap & BIT(pattrib->priority))
> - pattrib->ampdu_en = true;
> + /* check if enable ampdu */
> + if (pattrib->ht_en && psta->htpriv.ampdu_enable)
> + if (psta->htpriv.agg_enable_bitmap & BIT(pattrib->priority))
> + pattrib->ampdu_en = true;
>
> - /* re-check if enable ampdu by BA_starting_seqctrl */
> - if (pattrib->ampdu_en == true) {
> - u16 tx_seq;
> + /* re-check if enable ampdu by BA_starting_seqctrl */
> + if (pattrib->ampdu_en == true) {
> + u16 tx_seq;
>
> - tx_seq = psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f];
> + tx_seq = psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f];
>
> - /* check BA_starting_seqctrl */
> - if (SN_LESS(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
> - pattrib->ampdu_en = false;/* AGG BK */
> - } else if (SN_EQUAL(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
> - psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (tx_seq+1)&0xfff;
> + /* check BA_starting_seqctrl */
> + if (SN_LESS(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
> + pattrib->ampdu_en = false;/* AGG BK */
> + } else if (SN_EQUAL(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
> + psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (tx_seq+1)&0xfff;
>
> - pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
> - } else {
> - psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (pattrib->seqnum+1)&0xfff;
> - pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
> - }
> - }
> + pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
> + } else {
> + psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (pattrib->seqnum+1)&0xfff;
> + pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
> }
> }
> }
> --
> 2.32.0
>