Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add IMX8M Mini PCI support

[Adam Ford]

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 7:30 AM Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> Am Montag, dem 11.10.2021 um 07:25 -0500 schrieb Adam Ford:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:45 AM Tim Harvey <tharvey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:28 PM Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Tim:
> > > > Just as Ahmad mentioned, Lucas had issue one patch-set to support i.MX8MM PCIe.
> > > > Some comments in the review cycle.
> > > > - One separate PHY driver should be used for i.MX8MM PCIe driver.
> > > > - Schema file should be used I think, otherwise the .txt file in the dt-binding.
> > > >
> > > > I'm preparing one patch-set, but it's relied on the yaml file exchanges and power-domain changes(block control and so on).
> > > > Up to now, I only walking on the first step, trying to exchange the dt-binding files to schema yaml file.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards
> > > > Richard Zhu
> > >
> > > Richard / Ahmad,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your response - I did not see the series from Lucas. I will
> > > drop this and wait for him to complete his work.
> > >
> >
> > Tim,
> >
> > It appears that the power domain changes have been applied to Shawn's
> > for-next branch:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git/log/?h=for-next
> >
> > Is there any chance you could rebase and resend this series?
>
> This wasn't about the power domain series. I also tried to get i.MX8M
> PCIe upstream, but the feedback was that we need to split out the PHY
> functionality, Richard is currently working on this. There is no point
> in resending this series.

Sorry.  I missed that part.

adam
>
> Regards,
> Lucas
>