Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: nVMX: Track whether changes in L0 require MSR bitmap for L2 to be rebuilt

From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Mon Oct 11 2021 - 12:44:30 EST

Next message: Bayduraev, Alexey V: "Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] perf session: Move event read code to separate function"
Previous message: Fox Chen: "RE: [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review"
In reply to: Vitaly Kuznetsov: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: nVMX: Track whether changes in L0 require MSR bitmap for L2 to be rebuilt"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11/10/21 17:13, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:

The changelog kind of covers that, but those details will be completely lost to
readers of the code.

Would it help if we rename 'msr_bitmap_changed' to something?

Yeah, what about 'msr_bitmap_force_recalc'?

Paolo

Next message: Bayduraev, Alexey V: "Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] perf session: Move event read code to separate function"
Previous message: Fox Chen: "RE: [PATCH 5.14 000/151] 5.14.12-rc1 review"
In reply to: Vitaly Kuznetsov: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: nVMX: Track whether changes in L0 require MSR bitmap for L2 to be rebuilt"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]