Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: dts: sifive: drop duplicated nodes and properties in sifive

From: Alexandre Ghiti
Date: Tue Oct 12 2021 - 00:56:59 EST


On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:05 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The DTSI file defines soc node and address/size cells, so there is no
> point in duplicating it in DTS file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> 1. None
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts | 5 -----
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts | 5 -----
> 2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts
> index 2b4af7b4cc2f..ba304d4c455c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts
> @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
> #define RTCCLK_FREQ 1000000
>
> / {
> - #address-cells = <2>;
> - #size-cells = <2>;
> model = "SiFive HiFive Unleashed A00";
> compatible = "sifive,hifive-unleashed-a00", "sifive,fu540-c000",
> "sifive,fu540";
> @@ -27,9 +25,6 @@ memory@80000000 {
> reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x2 0x00000000>;
> };
>
> - soc {
> - };
> -
> hfclk: hfclk {
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
> index 9b0b9b85040e..4f66919215f6 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
> @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
> #define RTCCLK_FREQ 1000000
>
> / {
> - #address-cells = <2>;
> - #size-cells = <2>;
> model = "SiFive HiFive Unmatched A00";
> compatible = "sifive,hifive-unmatched-a00", "sifive,fu740-c000",
> "sifive,fu740";
> @@ -27,9 +25,6 @@ memory@80000000 {
> reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x4 0x00000000>;
> };
>
> - soc {
> - };
> -
> hfclk: hfclk {
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>

This looks good to me, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

Alex

> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv