Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] trace: prevent preemption in perf_ftrace_function_call()

[王贇]

On 2021/10/11 下午10:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>>> Oh, I might've gotten that wrong, I assumed regular trylock semantics,
>>> but it doesn't look like that's right.
>>
>> I will use bit instead ret and give some testing :-)
>>
>> BTW, would you prefer to merge these changes into this patch or maybe send
>> another patch with your suggested-by?
> 
> Yeah, please send another patch; once you've confirmed it actually works
> etc.. I did this before waking (as evidence per the above), who knows
> what else I did wrong :-)

I've send the:
  [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: make sure preemption disabled on recursion testing

should have taking care all the places, but only testing with x86 since I
got no machine for other arch... just by logically it should be fine.

Regards,
Michael Wang

>