Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: Add lan966x support

From: Philipp Zabel
Date: Tue Oct 12 2021 - 09:35:59 EST


Hi Horatiu,

On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 13:42 +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> This adds support for lan966x.
>
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml
> index 370579aeeca1..622cf3d0455d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml
> @@ -20,7 +20,11 @@ properties:
> pattern: "^reset-controller@[0-9a-f]+$"
>
> compatible:
> - const: microchip,sparx5-switch-reset
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - const: microchip,sparx5-switch-reset
> + - items:
> + - const: microchip,lan966x-switch-reset
>
> reg:
> items:
> @@ -37,6 +41,14 @@ properties:
> $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle"
> description: syscon used to access CPU reset
>
> + cuphy-syscon:
> + $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle"
> + description: syscon used to access CuPHY
> +
> + gpios:

>From the description I'd expect this to be called phy-reset-gpios.

> + description: used for release of reset of the external PHY
> + maxItems: 1
> +

Shouldn't an external PHY be described as a separate DT node, with its
own reset gpio?

regards
Philipp