Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm/writeback: Throttle based on page writeback instead of congestion

From: Vlastimil Babka
Date: Thu Oct 14 2021 - 11:34:45 EST


On 10/8/21 15:53, Mel Gorman wrote:
> do_writepages throttles on congestion if the writepages() fails due to a
> lack of memory but congestion_wait() is partially broken as the congestion
> state is not updated for all BDIs.
>
> This patch stalls waiting for a number of pages to complete writeback
> that located on the local node. The main weakness is that there is no
> correlation between the location of the inode's pages and locality but
> that is still better than congestion_wait.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>

> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 4812a17b288c..f34f54fcd5b4 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -2366,8 +2366,15 @@ int do_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> ret = generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
> if ((ret != -ENOMEM) || (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL))
> break;
> - cond_resched();
> - congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
> +
> + /*
> + * Lacking an allocation context or the locality or writeback
> + * state of any of the inode's pages, throttle based on
> + * writeback activity on the local node. It's as good a
> + * guess as any.
> + */
> + reclaim_throttle(NODE_DATA(numa_node_id()),
> + VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK, HZ/50);
> }
> /*
> * Usually few pages are written by now from those we've just submitted
>