Re: [PATCH v2 15/20] i2c: cht-wc: Make charger i2c-client instantiation board/device-model specific

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 11/16/21 12:20, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 7:04 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The i2c-controller on the Cherry Trail - Whiskey Cove PMIC is special
>> in that it is always connected to the I2C charger IC of the board on
>> which the PMIC is used; and the charger IC is not described in ACPI,
>> so the i2c-cht-wc code needs to instantiate an i2c-client for it itself.
>>
>> So far this was hardcoded to instantiate an i2c-client for the
>> bq24292i, with all properties, etc. set to match how this charger
>> is used on the GPD win and GPD pcoket devices.
> 
> "pocket" I believe?
> 
>> There is a rudimentary check to make sure the ACPI tables are at least
>> somewhat as expected, but this is far from accurate, leading to
>> a wrong i2c-client being instantiated for the charger on some boards.
>>
>> Switch to the new DMI based intel_cht_wc_get_model() helper which is
>> exported by the MFD driver for the CHT Whiskey Cove PMIC to help PMIC
>> cell drivers like the i2c-cht-wc code reliably detect which board
>> they are running on.
>>
>> And add board_info for the charger ICs as found on the other 2 known
>> boards with a Whisky Cove PMIC.
>>
>> This has been tested on all 3 known boards.
> 
> ...
> 
>> +/********** Lenovo Yogabook YB1-X90F/-X91F/-X91L charger settings **********/
>> +static const char * const lenovo_yb1_bq25892_suppliers[] = {
>> +       "cht_wcove_pwrsrc" };
> 
> Something went wrong with indentation...
> 
> ...
> 
>> +       /*
>> +        * The firmware sets everything to the defaults, which leads to a
>> +        * somewhat low charge-current of 2048mA and worse to a batter-voltage
> 
> battery?
> 
>> +        * of 4.2V instead of 4.35V (when booted without a charger connected).
>> +        * Use our own values instead of "linux,read-back-settings" to fix this.
>> +        */
> 
> ...

Ack to all of the above remarks.

> 
>> +       switch (intel_cht_wc_get_model()) {
>> +       case INTEL_CHT_WC_GPD_WIN_POCKET:
>> +               board_info = &gpd_win_board_info;
>> +               break;
>> +       case INTEL_CHT_WC_XIAOMI_MIPAD2:
>> +               board_info = &xiaomi_mipad2_board_info;
>> +               break;
>> +       case INTEL_CHT_WC_LENOVO_YOGABOOK1:
>> +               board_info = &lenovo_yogabook1_board_info;
>> +               break;
>> +       default:
>> +               dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Unknown model, not instantiating charger device\n");
> 
> break;

Why ?  Having a default without a break at the end of a switch-case
is quite a normal thing to do.

> 
>> +       }
> 

Regards,

Hams