Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] iio: adc: Add Xilinx AMS driver
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Tue Nov 16 2021 - 12:53:48 EST
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:08:40PM +0000, Anand Ashok Dumbre wrote:
> The AMS includes an ADC as well as on-chip sensors that can be used to
> sample external voltages and monitor on-die operating conditions, such
> as temperature and supply voltage levels. The AMS has two SYSMON blocks.
> PL-SYSMON block is capable of monitoring off chip voltage and
> temperature.
> PL-SYSMON block has DRP, JTAG and I2C interface to enable monitoring
> from an external master. Out of these interfaces currently only DRP is
> supported.
> Other block PS-SYSMON is memory mapped to PS.
> The AMS can use internal channels to monitor voltage and temperature as
> well as one primary and up to 16 auxiliary channels for measuring
> external voltages.
> The voltage and temperature monitoring channels also have event
> capability which allows to generate an interrupt when their value falls
> below or raises above a set threshold.
Something with indentation / paragraph splitting went wrong.
...
> +#define AMS_ALARM_THR_MIN 0x0000
> +#define AMS_ALARM_THR_MAX 0xFFFF
If this is limited by hardware register, I would rather use (BIT(16) - 1)
notation. It will give immediately amount of bits used for the value.
...
> +#define AMS_REGCFG1_ALARM_MASK (AMS_CONF1_ALARM_2_TO_0_MASK | \
> + AMS_CONF1_ALARM_6_TO_3_MASK | BIT(0))
Better to write as
#define AMS_REGCFG1_ALARM_MASK \
(AMS_CONF1_ALARM_2_TO_0_MASK | AMS_CONF1_ALARM_6_TO_3_MASK | BIT(0))
...
> +#define AMS_PL_CSTS_ACCESS_MASK 0x00000001U
BIT()
...
> + u32 reg;
> + int ret;
u32 expect = AMS_PS_CSTS_PS_READY;
(Use similar approach for other readX_poll_timeout() cases)
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(ams->base + AMS_PS_CSTS, reg,
> + (reg & AMS_PS_CSTS_PS_READY) ==
> + AMS_PS_CSTS_PS_READY, 0,
> + AMS_INIT_TIMEOUT_US);
ret = readl_poll_timeout(ams->base + AMS_PS_CSTS, reg,
(reg & expect) == expect,
0, AMS_INIT_TIMEOUT_US);
0?!
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
...
> + ret = readl(ams->base + AMS_PL_CSTS);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + return ret;
Assigning u32 to int seems wrong.
...
> +static int ams_enable_single_channel(struct ams *ams, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> + u8 channel_num = 0;
Assignment does not bring any value.
> + switch (offset) {
> + case AMS_VCC_PSPLL0:
> + channel_num = AMS_VCC_PSPLL0_CH;
> + break;
> + case AMS_VCC_PSPLL3:
> + channel_num = AMS_VCC_PSPLL3_CH;
> + break;
> + case AMS_VCCINT:
> + channel_num = AMS_VCCINT_CH;
> + break;
> + case AMS_VCCBRAM:
> + channel_num = AMS_VCCBRAM_CH;
> + break;
> + case AMS_VCCAUX:
> + channel_num = AMS_VCCAUX_CH;
> + break;
> + case AMS_PSDDRPLL:
> + channel_num = AMS_PSDDRPLL_CH;
> + break;
> + case AMS_PSINTFPDDR:
> + channel_num = AMS_PSINTFPDDR_CH;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* set single channel, sequencer off mode */
> + ams_ps_update_reg(ams, AMS_REG_CONFIG1, AMS_CONF1_SEQ_MASK,
> + AMS_CONF1_SEQ_SINGLE_CHANNEL);
> +
> + /* write the channel number */
> + ams_ps_update_reg(ams, AMS_REG_CONFIG0, AMS_CONF0_CHANNEL_NUM_MASK,
> + channel_num);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
...
> + regval = readl(ams->pl_base +
> + AMS_REG_CONFIG4);
One line?
> + regval = readl(ams->pl_base +
> + AMS_REG_CONFIG4);
Ditto and so on...
...
> +static int ams_get_alarm_mask(int scan_index)
> +{
> + int bit = 0;
> +
> + if (scan_index >= AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX) {
> + bit = AMS_PL_ALARM_START;
> + scan_index -= AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX;
> + }
> +
> + switch (scan_index) {
> + case AMS_SEQ_TEMP:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_TEMP + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_SUPPLY1:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_SUPPLY1 + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_SUPPLY2:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_SUPPLY2 + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_SUPPLY3:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_SUPPLY3 + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_SUPPLY4:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_SUPPLY4 + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_SUPPLY5:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_SUPPLY5 + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_SUPPLY6:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_SUPPLY6 + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_SUPPLY7:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_SUPPLY7 + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_SUPPLY8:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_SUPPLY8 + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_SUPPLY9:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_SUPPLY9 + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_SUPPLY10:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_SUPPLY10 + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_VCCAMS:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_VCCAMS + bit);
> + case AMS_SEQ_TEMP_REMOTE:
> + return BIT(AMS_ALARM_BIT_TEMP_REMOTE + bit);
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> + return 0;
Dead code.
> +}
...
> + return (ams->alarm_mask & ams_get_alarm_mask(chan->scan_index)) ? 1 : 0;
return !!(...);
simply shorter.
...
> + schedule_delayed_work(&ams->ams_unmask_work,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(AMS_UNMASK_TIMEOUT_MS));
Can be one line.
...
> + struct fwnode_handle *child_node = NULL,
You may drop _node from the name.
> + *fwnode = dev_fwnode(&pdev->dev);
...
> + if (check_mul_overflow(num_chan, sizeof(struct iio_chan_spec),
> + &ams_chan_size))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Initialize buffer for channel specification */
> + ams_channels = kzalloc(ams_chan_size, GFP_KERNEL);
Simply use array_size(). Or why not kcalloc()?
> + if (!ams_channels)
> + return -ENOMEM;
...
> + if (check_mul_overflow((size_t)num_channels, sizeof(struct iio_chan_spec),
> + &dev_chan_size))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + dev_channels = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, dev_chan_size, GFP_KERNEL);
Why not devm_kcalloc()?
> + if (!dev_channels) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> + }
...
> + ret = 0;
> +err:
Use better naming, you should describe what is going to be after goto.
> + kfree(ams_channels);
> +
> + return ret;
...
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, ams_clk_disable_unprepare,
> + ams->clk);
One line?
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
...
> + ret = ams_init_device(ams);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to initialize AMS\n");
> + return ret;
It's fine to use dev_err_probe() for known error codes.
> + }
...
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, &ams_irq, 0, "ams-irq",
> + indio_dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register interrupt\n");
> + return ret;
Ditto.
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko