Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] clk: qcom: Add LUCID_EVO PLL type for SDX65

[Vamsi Krishna Lanka]

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 01:55:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 15-11-21, 23:38, quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Add a LUCID_EVO PLL type for SDX65 SoC from Qualcomm.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h |   3 +
> >  2 files changed, 174 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> > index eaedcceb766f..b2dbb8d56773 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> >  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >  /*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2021, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> 
> This line should ideally come after the below line..

Will do.

> 
> >   * Copyright (c) 2015, 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >   */
> >  
> > @@ -139,6 +140,20 @@ const u8 clk_alpha_pll_regs[][PLL_OFF_MAX_REGS] = {
> >  		[PLL_OFF_OPMODE] = 0x28,
> >  		[PLL_OFF_STATUS] = 0x38,
> >  	},
> > +	[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_LUCID_EVO] = {
> > +		[PLL_OFF_OPMODE] = 0x04,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_STATUS] = 0x0c,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_L_VAL] = 0x10,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_ALPHA_VAL] = 0x14,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_USER_CTL] = 0x18,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_USER_CTL_U] = 0x1c,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL] = 0x20,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL_U] = 0x24,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL_U1] = 0x28,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL] = 0x2c,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL_U] = 0x30,
> > +		[PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL_U1] = 0x34,
> > +        },
> >  };
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_regs);
> >  
> > @@ -175,6 +190,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_regs);
> >  #define LUCID_5LPE_PLL_LATCH_INPUT	BIT(14)
> >  #define LUCID_5LPE_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN	BIT(21)
> >  
> > +/* LUCID EVO PLL specific settings and offsets */
> > +#define LUCID_EVO_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN       BIT(25)
> > +#define LUCID_EVO_PLL_L_VAL_MASK        GENMASK(15, 0)
> > +
> >  /* ZONDA PLL specific */
> >  #define ZONDA_PLL_OUT_MASK	0xf
> >  #define ZONDA_STAY_IN_CFA	BIT(16)
> > @@ -1951,3 +1970,155 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_zonda_ops = {
> >  	.set_rate = clk_zonda_pll_set_rate,
> >  };
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_alpha_pll_zonda_ops);
> > +
> > +static int alpha_pll_lucid_evo_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > +	struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> > +	struct regmap *regmap = pll->clkr.regmap;
> > +	u32 val;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = regmap_read(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	/* If in FSM mode, just vote for it */
> > +	if (val & LUCID_EVO_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN) {
> > +		ret = clk_enable_regmap(hw);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +		return wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Check if PLL is already enabled */
> > +	ret = trion_pll_is_enabled(pll, regmap);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +	else if (ret) {
> > +		pr_warn("%s PLL is already enabled\n",
> > +				clk_hw_get_name(&pll->clkr.hw));
> 
> this should fit in a single line

Will do.

> 
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_RESET_N, PLL_RESET_N);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Set operation mode to RUN */
> > +	regmap_write(regmap, PLL_OPMODE(pll), PLL_RUN);
> > +
> > +	ret = wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Enable the PLL outputs */
> > +	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), PLL_OUT_MASK, PLL_OUT_MASK);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Enable the global PLL outputs */
> > +	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_OUTCTRL, PLL_OUTCTRL);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Ensure that the write above goes through before returning. */
> > +	mb();
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void alpha_pll_lucid_evo_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > +	struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> > +	struct regmap *regmap = pll->clkr.regmap;
> > +	u32 val;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = regmap_read(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	/* If in FSM mode, just unvote it */
> > +	if (val & LUCID_EVO_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN) {
> > +		clk_disable_regmap(hw);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Disable the global PLL output */
> > +	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_OUTCTRL, 0);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	/* Disable the PLL outputs */
> > +	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), PLL_OUT_MASK, 0);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	/* Place the PLL mode in STANDBY */
> > +	regmap_write(regmap, PLL_OPMODE(pll), PLL_STANDBY);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static unsigned long alpha_pll_lucid_evo_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > +		unsigned long parent_rate)
> 
> pls align this to preceding line open brace

Will do.

> 
> > +{
> > +	struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> > +	struct regmap *regmap = pll->clkr.regmap;
> > +	u32 l, frac;
> > +
> > +	regmap_read(regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), &l);
> > +	l &= LUCID_EVO_PLL_L_VAL_MASK;
> > +	regmap_read(regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), &frac);
> > +
> > +	return alpha_pll_calc_rate(parent_rate, l, frac, pll_alpha_width(pll));
> > +}
> 
> I think this can use __alpha_pll_trion_set_rate()

I didn't get with which function are you comparing this. I cannot able to
find any function similar to this.

> 
> > +
> > +static int clk_lucid_evo_pll_postdiv_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > +		unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate)
> > +{
> > +	struct clk_alpha_pll_postdiv *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll_postdiv(hw);
> > +	struct regmap *regmap = pll->clkr.regmap;
> > +	int i, val, div, ret;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If the PLL is in FSM mode, then treat set_rate callback as a
> > +	 * no-operation.
> > +	 */
> > +	ret = regmap_read(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	if (val & LUCID_EVO_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (!pll->post_div_table) {
> > +		pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	div = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate, rate);
> > +	for (i = 0; i < pll->num_post_div; i++) {
> > +		if (pll->post_div_table[i].div == div) {
> > +			val = pll->post_div_table[i].val;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll),
> > +			(BIT(pll->width) - 1) << pll->post_div_shift,
> > +			val << pll->post_div_shift);
> > +}
> 
> This looks _very_ similar to clk_lucid_5lpe_pll_postdiv_set_rate() maybe
> add a helper which both can use and pass on the
> LUCID_EVO_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN as argument to helper?

That's a good thought. I can do that.

> 
> -- 
> ~Vinod