Re: [PATCH] vfs: check dentry is still valid in get_link()

From: Al Viro
Date: Sat Jan 15 2022 - 01:39:26 EST


On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 05:11:31PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> When following a trailing symlink in rcu-walk mode it's possible for
> the dentry to become invalid between the last dentry seq lock check
> and getting the link (eg. an unlink) leading to a backtrace similar
> to this:
>
> crash> bt
> PID: 10964 TASK: ffff951c8aa92f80 CPU: 3 COMMAND: "TaniumCX"
>
> #7 [ffffae44d0a6fbe0] page_fault at ffffffff8d6010fe
> [exception RIP: unknown or invalid address]
> RIP: 0000000000000000 RSP: ffffae44d0a6fc90 RFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: ffffffff8da3cc80 RBX: ffffae44d0a6fd30 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: ffffae44d0a6fd98 RSI: ffff951aa9af3008 RDI: 0000000000000000
> RBP: 0000000000000000 R8: ffffae44d0a6fb94 R9: 0000000000000000
> R10: ffff951c95d8c318 R11: 0000000000080000 R12: ffffae44d0a6fd98
> R13: ffff951aa9af3008 R14: ffff951c8c9eb840 R15: 0000000000000000
> ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
> #8 [ffffae44d0a6fc90] trailing_symlink at ffffffff8cf24e61
> #9 [ffffae44d0a6fcc8] path_lookupat at ffffffff8cf261d1
> #10 [ffffae44d0a6fd28] filename_lookup at ffffffff8cf2a700
> #11 [ffffae44d0a6fe40] vfs_statx at ffffffff8cf1dbc4
> #12 [ffffae44d0a6fe98] __do_sys_newstat at ffffffff8cf1e1f9
> #13 [ffffae44d0a6ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8cc0420b
>
> Most of the time this is not a problem because the inode is unchanged
> while the rcu read lock is held.
>
> But xfs can re-use inodes which can result in the inode ->get_link()
> method becoming invalid (or NULL).

Without an RCU delay? Then we have much worse problems...

Details, please.