Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] regmap: provide regmap_field helpers for simple bit operations
From: Samuel Holland
Date: Sun May 22 2022 - 23:10:07 EST
Hi,
On 5/22/22 9:23 PM, Li Chen wrote:
> From: Li Chen <lchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We have set/clear/test operations for regmap, but not for regmap_field yet.
> So let's introduce regmap_field helpers too.
>
> In many instances regmap_field_update_bits() is used for simple bit setting
> and clearing. In these cases the last argument is redundant and we can
> hide it with a static inline function.
>
> This adds three new helpers for simple bit operations: set_bits,
> clear_bits and test_bits (the last one defined as a regular function).
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Chen <lchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/regmap.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
> index 5e12f7cb5147..a37d6041b7bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
> @@ -2208,6 +2208,28 @@ int regmap_field_update_bits_base(struct regmap_field *field,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regmap_field_update_bits_base);
>
> +/**
> + * regmap_field_test_bits() - Check if all specified bits are set in a
> + * register field.
> + *
> + * @field: Register field to operate on
> + * @bits: Bits to test
> + *
> + * Returns -1 if the underlying regmap_field_read() fails, 0 if at least one of the
> + * tested bits is not set and 1 if all tested bits are set.
> + */
> +int regmap_field_test_bits(struct regmap_field *field, unsigned int bits)
> +{
> + unsigned int val, ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_field_read(field, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return (val & bits) == bits;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regmap_field_test_bits);
> +
> /**
> * regmap_fields_update_bits_base() - Perform a read/modify/write cycle a
> * register field with port ID
> diff --git a/include/linux/regmap.h b/include/linux/regmap.h
> index de81a94d7b30..10b410734d9e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/regmap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/regmap.h
> @@ -1324,6 +1324,22 @@ static inline int regmap_field_update_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> NULL, false, false);
> }
>
> +static inline int regmap_field_set_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> + unsigned int bits)
> +{
> + return regmap_field_update_bits_base(field, bits, 0, NULL, false,
> + false);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int regmap_field_clear_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> + unsigned int bits)
> +{
> + return regmap_field_update_bits_base(field, bits, bits, NULL, false,
> + false);
The contents of these two functions are swapped when compared to their names.
Regards,
Samuel
> +}
> +
> +int regmap_field_test_bits(struct regmap_field *field, unsigned int bits);
> +
> static inline int
> regmap_field_force_update_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> unsigned int mask, unsigned int val)
> @@ -1757,6 +1773,27 @@ regmap_field_force_update_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static inline int regmap_field_set_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> + unsigned int bits)
> +{
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "regmap API is disabled");
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int regmap_field_clear_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> + unsigned int bits)
> +{
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "regmap API is disabled");
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int regmap_field_test_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> + unsigned int bits)
> +{
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "regmap API is disabled");
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> static inline int regmap_fields_write(struct regmap_field *field,
> unsigned int id, unsigned int val)
> {
>