Re: [PATCH v9 25/32] timers: Add get next timer interrupt functionality for remote CPUs

[Anna-Maria Behnsen]

Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 2023-12-01 10:26:47 [+0100], Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
>> To prepare for the conversion of the NOHZ timer placement to a pull at
>> expiry time model it's required to have functionality available getting the
>> next timer interrupt on a remote CPU.
>> 
>> Locking of the timer bases and getting the information for the next timer
>> interrupt functionality is split into separate functions. This is required
>> to be compliant with lock ordering when the new model is in place.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Please fold the hunk below, it keeps sparse happy.

Thanks, I will do!

	Anna-Maria