Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: mailbox: arm,mhuv3: Add bindings

From: Jassi Brar
Date: Sun Apr 07 2024 - 19:39:13 EST


On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 1:25 AM Cristian Marussi
<cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add bindings for the ARM MHUv3 Mailbox controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2 -> v3
> - fixed spurious tabs in dt_binding_check
> v1 -> v2
> - clarified extension descriptions around configurability and discoverability
> - removed unused labels from the example
> - using pattern properties to define interrupt-names
> - bumped interrupt maxItems to 74 (allowing uo to 8 channels per extension)
> ---
> .../bindings/mailbox/arm,mhuv3.yaml | 217 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 217 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhuv3.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhuv3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhuv3.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..32a8bb711464
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhuv3.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mailbox/arm,mhuv3.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: ARM MHUv3 Mailbox Controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> + - Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> + The Arm Message Handling Unit (MHU) Version 3 is a mailbox controller that
> + enables unidirectional communications with remote processors through various
> + possible transport protocols.
> + The controller can optionally support a varying number of extensions that, in
> + turn, enable different kinds of transport to be used for communication.
> + Number, type and characteristics of each supported extension can be discovered
> + dynamically at runtime.
> +
> + Given the unidirectional nature of the controller, an MHUv3 mailbox controller
> + is composed of a MHU Sender (MHUS) containing a PostBox (PBX) block and a MHU
> + Receiver (MHUR) containing a MailBox (MBX) block, where
> +
> + PBX is used to
> + - Configure the MHU
> + - Send Transfers to the Receiver
> + - Optionally receive acknowledgment of a Transfer from the Receiver
> +
> + MBX is used to
> + - Configure the MHU
> + - Receive Transfers from the Sender
> + - Optionally acknowledge Transfers sent by the Sender
> +
> + Both PBX and MBX need to be present and defined in the DT description if you
> + need to establish a bidirectional communication, since you will have to
> + acquire two distinct unidirectional channels, one for each block.
> +
> + As a consequence both blocks needs to be represented separately and specified
> + as distinct DT nodes in order to properly describe their resources.
> +
> + Note that, though, thanks to the runtime discoverability, there is no need to
> + identify the type of blocks with distinct compatibles.
> +
> + Following are the MHUv3 possible extensions.
> +
> + - Doorbell Extension (DBE): DBE defines a type of channel called a Doorbell
> + Channel (DBCH). DBCH enables a single bit Transfer to be sent from the
> + Sender to Receiver. The Transfer indicates that an event has occurred.
> + When DBE is implemented, the number of DBCHs that an implementation of the
> + MHU can support is between 1 and 128, numbered starting from 0 in ascending
> + order and discoverable at run-time.
> + Each DBCH contains 32 individual fields, referred to as flags, each of which
> + can be used independently. It is possible for the Sender to send multiple
> + Transfers at once using a single DBCH, so long as each Transfer uses
> + a different flag in the DBCH.
> + Optionally, data may be transmitted through an out-of-band shared memory
> + region, wherein the MHU Doorbell is used strictly as an interrupt generation
> + mechanism, but this is out of the scope of these bindings.
> +
> + - FastChannel Extension (FCE): FCE defines a type of channel called a Fast
> + Channel (FCH). FCH is intended for lower overhead communication between
> + Sender and Receiver at the expense of determinism. An FCH allows the Sender
> + to update the channel value at any time, regardless of whether the previous
> + value has been seen by the Receiver. When the Receiver reads the channel's
> + content it gets the last value written to the channel.
> + FCH is considered lossy in nature, and means that the Sender has no way of
> + knowing if, or when, the Receiver will act on the Transfer.
> + FCHs are expected to behave as RAM which generates interrupts when writes
> + occur to the locations within the RAM.
> + When FCE is implemented, the number of FCHs that an implementation of the
> + MHU can support is between 1-1024, if the FastChannel word-size is 32-bits,
> + or between 1-512, when the FastChannel word-size is 64-bits.
> + FCHs are numbered from 0 in ascending order.
> + Note that the number of FCHs and the word-size are implementation defined,
> + not configurable but discoverable at run-time.
> + Optionally, data may be transmitted through an out-of-band shared memory
> + region, wherein the MHU FastChannel is used as an interrupt generation
> + mechanism which carries also a pointer to such out-of-band data, but this
> + is out of the scope of these bindings.
> +
> + - FIFO Extension (FE): FE defines a Channel type called a FIFO Channel (FFCH).
> + FFCH allows a Sender to send
> + - Multiple Transfers to the Receiver without having to wait for the
> + previous Transfer to be acknowledged by the Receiver, as long as the
> + FIFO has room for the Transfer.
> + - Transfers which require the Receiver to provide acknowledgment.
> + - Transfers which have in-band payload.
> + In all cases, the data is guaranteed to be observed by the Receiver in the
> + same order which the Sender sent it.
> + When FE is implemented, the number of FFCHs that an implementation of the
> + MHU can support is between 1 and 64, numbered starting from 0 in ascending
> + order. The number of FFCHs, their depth (same for all implemented FFCHs) and
> + the access-granularity are implementation defined, not configurable but
> + discoverable at run-time.
> + Optionally, additional data may be transmitted through an out-of-band shared
> + memory region, wherein the MHU FIFO is used to transmit, in order, a small
> + part of the payload (like a header) and a reference to the shared memory
> + area holding the remaining, bigger, chunk of the payload, but this is out of
> + the scope of these bindings.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: arm,mhuv3
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 74
> +
> + interrupt-names:
> + description: |
> + The MHUv3 controller generates a number of events some of which are used
> + to generate interrupts; as a consequence it can expose a varying number of
> + optional PBX/MBX interrupts, representing the events generated during the
> + operation of the various transport protocols associated with different
> + extensions. All interrupts of the MHU are level-sensitive.
> + Some of these optional interrupts are defined per-channel, where the
> + number of channels effectively available is implementation defined and
> + run-time discoverable.
> + In the following names are enumerated using patterns, with per-channel
> + interrupts implicitly capped at the maximum channels allowed by the
> + specification for each extension type.
> + For the sake of simplicity maxItems is anyway capped to a most plausible
> + number, assuming way less channels would be implemented than actually
> + possible.
> +
> + The only mandatory interrupts on the MHU are:
> + - combined
> + - mbx-fch-xfer-<N> but only if mbx-fcgrp-xfer-<N> is not implemented.
> +
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 74
> + items:
> + oneOf:
> + - const: combined
> + description: PBX/MBX Combined interrupt
> + - const: combined-ffch
> + description: PBX/MBX FIFO Combined interrupt
> + - pattern: '^ffch-low-tide-[0-9]+$'
> + description: PBX/MBX FIFO Channel <N> Low Tide interrupt
> + - pattern: '^ffch-high-tide-[0-9]+$'
> + description: PBX/MBX FIFO Channel <N> High Tide interrupt
> + - pattern: '^ffch-flush-[0-9]+$'
> + description: PBX/MBX FIFO Channel <N> Flush interrupt
> + - pattern: '^mbx-dbch-xfer-[0-9]+$'
> + description: MBX Doorbell Channel <N> Transfer interrupt
> + - pattern: '^mbx-fch-xfer-[0-9]+$'
> + description: MBX FastChannel <N> Transfer interrupt
> + - pattern: '^mbx-fchgrp-xfer-[0-9]+$'
> + description: MBX FastChannel <N> Group Transfer interrupt
> + - pattern: '^mbx-ffch-xfer-[0-9]+$'
> + description: MBX FIFO Channel <N> Transfer interrupt
> + - pattern: '^pbx-dbch-xfer-ack-[0-9]+$'
> + description: PBX Doorbell Channel <N> Transfer Ack interrupt
> + - pattern: '^pbx-ffch-xfer-ack-[0-9]+$'
> + description: PBX FIFO Channel <N> Transfer Ack interrupt
> +
Can we have optional subnodes (with different properties as required)
for each extension type ?


> + '#mbox-cells':
> + description: |
> + The first argument in the consumers 'mboxes' property represents the
> + extension type, the second is for the channel number while the third
> + depends on extension type.
> +
> + Extension type for DBE is 0 and the third parameter represents the
> + doorbell flag number to use.
> + Extension type for FCE is 1, third parameter unused.
> + Extension type for FE is 2, third parameter unused.
> +
> + mboxes = <&mhu 0 0 5>; // DBE, Doorbell Channel Window 0, doorbell flag 5.
> + mboxes = <&mhu 0 1 7>; // DBE, Doorbell Channel Window 1, doorbell flag 7.
> + mboxes = <&mhu 1 0 0>; // FCE, FastChannel Window 0.
> + mboxes = <&mhu 1 3 0>; // FCE, FastChannel Window 3.
> + mboxes = <&mhu 2 1 0>; // FE, FIFO Channel Window 1.
> + mboxes = <&mhu 2 7 0>; // FE, FIFO Channel Window 7.
>
Please define the extension types, instead of 0, 1 and 2.

Cheers!
Jassi