Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: add docs for per-order mTHP split counters

From: Ryan Roberts
Date: Wed Apr 24 2024 - 11:35:41 EST


On 24/04/2024 14:51, Lance Yang wrote:
> This commit introduces documentation for mTHP split counters in
> transhuge.rst.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst
> index f82300b9193f..35d574a531c8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst
> @@ -475,6 +475,22 @@ anon_swpout_fallback
> Usually because failed to allocate some continuous swap space
> for the huge page.
>
> +split_page
> + is incremented every time a huge page is split into base

perhaps "...successfully split into base..." to make it clear that this is only
incremented on success.

> + pages. This can happen for a variety of reasons but a common
> + reason is that a huge page is old and is being reclaimed.
> + This action implies splitting all PMD/PTE mapped with the huge page.

What does it mean to "split all PTE"? It's already at its smallest granularity.
Perhaps "This action implies splitting any block mappings into PTEs."?

> +
> +split_page_failed
> + is incremented if kernel fails to split huge
> + page. This can happen if the page was pinned by somebody.
> +
> +deferred_split_page
> + is incremented when a huge page is put onto split
> + queue. This happens when a huge page is partially unmapped and
> + splitting it would free up some memory. Pages on split queue are
> + going to be split under memory pressure.
> +
> As the system ages, allocating huge pages may be expensive as the
> system uses memory compaction to copy data around memory to free a
> huge page for use. There are some counters in ``/proc/vmstat`` to help