Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] drm/panel: ili9341: Correct use of device property APIs

[Neil Armstrong]

On 25/04/2024 16:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> It seems driver missed the point of proper use of device property APIs.
> Correct this by updating headers and calls respectively.
>
> Fixes: 5a04227326b0 ("drm/panel: Add ilitek ili9341 panel driver")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig                | 2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9341.c | 5 +++--
>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
> index e54f6f5604ed..2d4515555820 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ config DRM_PANEL_ILITEK_IL9322
>   
>   config DRM_PANEL_ILITEK_ILI9341
>   	tristate "Ilitek ILI9341 240x320 QVGA panels"
> -	depends on OF && SPI
> +	depends on SPI
>   	select DRM_KMS_HELPER
>   	select DRM_GEM_DMA_HELPER
>   	depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9341.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9341.c
> index 3574681891e8..7584ddb0e441 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9341.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9341.c
> @@ -22,8 +22,9 @@
>   #include <linux/bitops.h>
>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>   #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>   #include <linux/module.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
>   #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>   #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>   
> @@ -691,7 +692,7 @@ static int ili9341_dpi_probe(struct spi_device *spi, struct gpio_desc *dc,
>   	 * Every new incarnation of this display must have a unique
>   	 * data entry for the system in this driver.
>   	 */
> -	ili->conf = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	ili->conf = device_get_match_data(dev);
>   	if (!ili->conf) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "missing device configuration\n");
>   		return -ENODEV;

Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>