[PATCH v2] KVM: selftests: Use TAP interface in the set_memory_region test
From: Thomas Huth
Date: Fri Apr 26 2024 - 07:46:12 EST
Use the kselftest_harness.h interface in this test to get TAP
output, so that it is easier for the user to see what the test
is doing. (Note: We are not using the KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST_SUITE()
macro here since these tests are creating their VMs with the
vm_create_barebones() function, not with vm_create_with_one_vcpu())
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
- Rebase to linux-next branch
- Make "loops" variable static
- Added Andrew's Reviewed-by
.../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 86 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
index 68c899d27561..a5c9bee5235a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <test_util.h>
#include <kvm_util.h>
#include <processor.h>
+#include "kselftest_harness.h"
/*
* s390x needs at least 1MB alignment, and the x86_64 MOVE/DELETE tests need a
@@ -38,6 +39,8 @@ extern const uint64_t final_rip_end;
static sem_t vcpu_ready;
+static int loops;
+
static inline uint64_t guest_spin_on_val(uint64_t spin_val)
{
uint64_t val;
@@ -219,6 +222,13 @@ static void test_move_memory_region(void)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
+TEST(move_in_use_region)
+{
+ ksft_print_msg("Testing MOVE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops);
+ for (int i = 0; i < loops; i++)
+ test_move_memory_region();
+}
+
static void guest_code_delete_memory_region(void)
{
uint64_t val;
@@ -308,12 +318,19 @@ static void test_delete_memory_region(void)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
-static void test_zero_memory_regions(void)
+TEST(delete_in_use_region)
+{
+ ksft_print_msg("Testing DELETE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops);
+ for (int i = 0; i < loops; i++)
+ test_delete_memory_region();
+}
+
+TEST(zero_memory_regions)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
- pr_info("Testing KVM_RUN with zero added memory regions\n");
+ ksft_print_msg("Testing KVM_RUN with zero added memory regions\n");
vm = vm_create_barebones();
vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
@@ -326,7 +343,7 @@ static void test_zero_memory_regions(void)
}
#endif /* __x86_64__ */
-static void test_invalid_memory_region_flags(void)
+TEST(invalid_memory_region_flags)
{
uint32_t supported_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
const uint32_t v2_only_flags = KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD;
@@ -389,7 +406,7 @@ static void test_invalid_memory_region_flags(void)
* Test it can be added memory slots up to KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS, then any
* tentative to add further slots should fail.
*/
-static void test_add_max_memory_regions(void)
+TEST(add_max_memory_regions)
{
int ret;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
@@ -408,13 +425,13 @@ static void test_add_max_memory_regions(void)
max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 0,
"KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 0");
- pr_info("Allowed number of memory slots: %i\n", max_mem_slots);
+ ksft_print_msg("Allowed number of memory slots: %i\n", max_mem_slots);
vm = vm_create_barebones();
/* Check it can be added memory slots up to the maximum allowed */
- pr_info("Adding slots 0..%i, each memory region with %dK size\n",
- (max_mem_slots - 1), MEM_REGION_SIZE >> 10);
+ ksft_print_msg("Adding slots 0..%i, each memory region with %dK size\n",
+ (max_mem_slots - 1), MEM_REGION_SIZE >> 10);
mem = mmap(NULL, (size_t)max_mem_slots * MEM_REGION_SIZE + alignment,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
@@ -455,12 +472,21 @@ static void test_invalid_guest_memfd(struct kvm_vm *vm, int memfd,
TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "%s", msg);
}
-static void test_add_private_memory_region(void)
+static bool has_cap_guest_memfd(void)
+{
+ return kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD) &&
+ (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM));
+}
+
+TEST(add_private_memory_region)
{
struct kvm_vm *vm, *vm2;
int memfd, i;
- pr_info("Testing ADD of KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
+ if (!has_cap_guest_memfd())
+ SKIP(return, "Missing KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD / KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM");
+
+ ksft_print_msg("Testing ADD of KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
vm = vm_create_barebones_type(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM);
@@ -491,13 +517,16 @@ static void test_add_private_memory_region(void)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
-static void test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(void)
+TEST(add_overlapping_private_memory_regions)
{
struct kvm_vm *vm;
int memfd;
int r;
- pr_info("Testing ADD of overlapping KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
+ if (!has_cap_guest_memfd())
+ SKIP(return, "Missing KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD / KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM");
+
+ ksft_print_msg("Testing ADD of overlapping KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
vm = vm_create_barebones_type(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM);
@@ -536,46 +565,15 @@ static void test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(void)
close(memfd);
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
+
#endif
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
-#ifdef __x86_64__
- int i, loops;
-
- /*
- * FIXME: the zero-memslot test fails on aarch64 and s390x because
- * KVM_RUN fails with ENOEXEC or EFAULT.
- */
- test_zero_memory_regions();
-#endif
-
- test_invalid_memory_region_flags();
-
- test_add_max_memory_regions();
-
-#ifdef __x86_64__
- if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD) &&
- (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM))) {
- test_add_private_memory_region();
- test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions();
- } else {
- pr_info("Skipping tests for KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
- }
-
if (argc > 1)
loops = atoi_positive("Number of iterations", argv[1]);
else
loops = 10;
- pr_info("Testing MOVE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops);
- for (i = 0; i < loops; i++)
- test_move_memory_region();
-
- pr_info("Testing DELETE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops);
- for (i = 0; i < loops; i++)
- test_delete_memory_region();
-#endif
-
- return 0;
+ return test_harness_run(argc, argv);
}
--
2.44.0