Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Fri Apr 26 2024 - 11:24:56 EST

Next message: Suren Baghdasaryan: "Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: Fix some minor per-VMA lock issues in userfaultfd"
Previous message: I Hsin Cheng: "[PATCH] tcp_bbr: replace lambda expression with bitwise operation for bit flip"
In reply to: Kalra, Ashish: "Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec."
Next in thread: Kalra, Ashish: "Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 09:47:02AM -0500, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> I should have mentioned *chained* guest kexec above instead of nested guest
> kexec.

What is a "chained guest kexec" now?

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Next message: Suren Baghdasaryan: "Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: Fix some minor per-VMA lock issues in userfaultfd"
Previous message: I Hsin Cheng: "[PATCH] tcp_bbr: replace lambda expression with bitwise operation for bit flip"
In reply to: Kalra, Ashish: "Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec."
Next in thread: Kalra, Ashish: "Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]