[PATCH 05/15] i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()

[Wolfram Sang]

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
index 36e8f6196a87..0197786892a2 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
@@ -307,11 +307,11 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_master_disable(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
 
 static int lpi2c_imx_msg_complete(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ);
 
-	return timeout ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
+	return time_left ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
 }
 
 static int lpi2c_imx_txfifo_empty(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
-- 
2.43.0