Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/141] 6.1.88-rc1 review

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Sun Apr 28 2024 - 12:24:31 EST


On 4/28/24 05:32, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
Greg,

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:53:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.88 release.
There are 141 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.88-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

As Pavel reported,

LKFT also found these regressions on 6.1.

The arm build failed with gcc-13 and clang-17 on the Linux stable-rc
linux.6.1.y branch.

arm:
* omap2plus_defconfig - failed
* defconfig - failed

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm curious why v6.1.88 is still released nevertheless the reports of the
build regression on ARM32.


It would also be interesting to understand why commit 0f4048e1a0c6 ("ASoC:
ti: Convert Pandora ASoC to GPIO descriptors") was necessary. It doesn't
immediately look like a bug fix.

Thanks,
Guenter