Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in sock_map_delete_elem

From: syzbot
Date: Mon Apr 29 2024 - 21:13:40 EST

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit: ba1cb99b559e Merge branch 'vxlan-stats'
git tree: net
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=176b097f180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=98d5a8e00ed1044a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4ac2fe2b496abca8fa4b
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=10795c90980000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=114465e8980000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a5f29f03f4a8/disk-ba1cb99b.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/b1a9f6891628/vmlinux-ba1cb99b.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/2f21db47d56d/bzImage-ba1cb99b.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+4ac2fe2b496abca8fa4b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00184-gba1cb99b559e #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u8:6/1269 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807e310200 (&stab->lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff88807e310200 (&stab->lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:417 [inline]
ffff88807e310200 (&stab->lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_delete_elem+0x175/0x250 net/core/sock_map.c:449

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888024253290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff888024253290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:145 [inline]
ffff888024253290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_unref+0xcc/0x5e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_map_add_link net/core/sock_map.c:134 [inline]
sock_map_update_common+0x31c/0x5b0 net/core/sock_map.c:503
sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x55f/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:582
map_update_elem+0x53a/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641
__sys_bpf+0x76f/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5648
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5767 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&stab->lock){+...}-{2:2}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
__sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:417 [inline]
sock_map_delete_elem+0x175/0x250 net/core/sock_map.c:449
0xffffffffa00020cb
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
__traceiter_kfree+0x2b/0x50 include/trace/events/kmem.h:94
trace_kfree include/trace/events/kmem.h:94 [inline]
kfree+0x2af/0x3a0 mm/slub.c:4377
sk_psock_free_link include/linux/skmsg.h:421 [inline]
sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:158 [inline]
sock_map_unref+0x3ac/0x5e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
sock_map_free+0x1e7/0x3e0 net/core/sock_map.c:351
bpf_map_free_deferred+0xe6/0x110 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:734
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa10/0x17c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&psock->link_lock);
lock(&stab->lock);
lock(&psock->link_lock);
lock(&stab->lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

6 locks held by kworker/u8:6/1269:
#0: ffff888015089148 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline]
#0: ffff888015089148 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x8e0/0x17c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
#1: ffffc90005557d00 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3230 [inline]
#1: ffffc90005557d00 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x91b/0x17c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
#2: ffff888023be2258 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1673 [inline]
#2: ffff888023be2258 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_map_free+0x11e/0x3e0 net/core/sock_map.c:349
#3: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: sock_map_free+0x12a/0x3e0 net/core/sock_map.c:350
#4: ffff888024253290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
#4: ffff888024253290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:145 [inline]
#4: ffff888024253290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_unref+0xcc/0x5e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
#5: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2380 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x114/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 1269 Comm: kworker/u8:6 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00184-gba1cb99b559e #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
__sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:417 [inline]
sock_map_delete_elem+0x175/0x250 net/core/sock_map.c:449
</TASK>


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.