Re: [PATCH v4 17/17] fsi: scom: Update compatible string to match documentation

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 29/04/2024 23:01, Eddie James wrote:
> Use p9-scom instead of fsi2pib.

Why? Commits must *always* say why you are doing it. What is easy to see.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/fsi/fsi-scom.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-scom.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-scom.c
> index 61dbda9dbe2b..18ca213fdc7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-scom.c
> +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-scom.c
> @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static int scom_remove(struct device *dev)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id scom_of_ids[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "ibm,fsi2pib" },
> +	{ .compatible = "ibm,p9-scom" },

This breaks all users without any explanation in the commit!

Best regards,
Krzysztof