Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix Kselftest's vfork() side effects

From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Tue Apr 30 2024 - 11:13:20 EST

Next message: Jonathan Cameron: "Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] ACPI/NUMA: Return memblk modification state from numa_fill_memblks()"
Previous message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH] hardening: Refresh KCFI options, add some more"
In reply to: Mickaël Salaün: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix Kselftest's vfork() side effects"
Next in thread: Mickaël Salaün: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix Kselftest's vfork() side effects"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:54:38 +0200 Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Jakub, can you please review it?

I looked thru it. I don't have the cycles to investigate and suggest
a better approach but the sprinkling of mmaps(), if nothing else, feels
a bit band-aid-y 🤷️

Next message: Jonathan Cameron: "Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] ACPI/NUMA: Return memblk modification state from numa_fill_memblks()"
Previous message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH] hardening: Refresh KCFI options, add some more"
In reply to: Mickaël Salaün: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix Kselftest's vfork() side effects"
Next in thread: Mickaël Salaün: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix Kselftest's vfork() side effects"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]