Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] mm: cleanup WORKINGSET_NODES in workingset

From: T.J. Mercier
Date: Tue Apr 30 2024 - 13:32:40 EST


On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 11:06 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> WORKINGSET_NODES is not exposed in the memcg stats and thus there is no
> need to use the memcg specific stat update functions for it. In future
> if we decide to expose WORKINGSET_NODES in the memcg stats, we can
> revert this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>
> Changes since v2:
> - N/A
>
> mm/workingset.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
> index f2a0ecaf708d..c22adb93622a 100644
> --- a/mm/workingset.c
> +++ b/mm/workingset.c
> @@ -618,6 +618,7 @@ struct list_lru shadow_nodes;
> void workingset_update_node(struct xa_node *node)
> {
> struct address_space *mapping;
> + struct page *page = virt_to_page(node);
>
> /*
> * Track non-empty nodes that contain only shadow entries;
> @@ -633,12 +634,12 @@ void workingset_update_node(struct xa_node *node)
> if (node->count && node->count == node->nr_values) {
> if (list_empty(&node->private_list)) {
> list_lru_add_obj(&shadow_nodes, &node->private_list);
> - __inc_lruvec_kmem_state(node, WORKINGSET_NODES);
> + __inc_node_page_state(page, WORKINGSET_NODES);
> }
> } else {
> if (!list_empty(&node->private_list)) {
> list_lru_del_obj(&shadow_nodes, &node->private_list);
> - __dec_lruvec_kmem_state(node, WORKINGSET_NODES);
> + __dec_node_page_state(page, WORKINGSET_NODES);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -742,7 +743,7 @@ static enum lru_status shadow_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item,
> }
>
> list_lru_isolate(lru, item);
> - __dec_lruvec_kmem_state(node, WORKINGSET_NODES);
> + __dec_node_page_state(virt_to_page(node), WORKINGSET_NODES);
>
> spin_unlock(lru_lock);
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>